Garg Prashant, Fetzer Thiemo
Department of Economics and Public Policy, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Department of Economics, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
Nat Hum Behav. 2025 Jun 3. doi: 10.1038/s41562-025-02199-1.
Academics play a vital role in the generation and dissemination of knowledge, ideas and narratives. Social media provide new, more direct ways of science communication. Yet, since not all academics engage with social media, the sample that does so may have an outsized influence on shaping public perceptions of academia through the set topics they engage with and their style and tone of communication. We describe patterns in academics' expression online using an international dataset covering nearly 100,000 scholars linking their Twitter content to academic records. We document large and systematic variation in politically salient academic expression concerning climate action, cultural and economic concepts. We show that US academics often diverge from the US Twitter population at large in topic focus and style, although academics are not necessarily more extreme in their beliefs. Future work should examine potential impacts on public trust and the reasons why academics express themselves politically on social media.
学者在知识、思想和叙事的产生与传播中发挥着至关重要的作用。社交媒体提供了新的、更直接的科学传播方式。然而,由于并非所有学者都参与社交媒体,那些参与其中的样本可能会通过他们所关注的特定话题以及交流的风格和语气,对塑造公众对学术界的看法产生过大影响。我们使用一个国际数据集来描述学者在网上的表达模式,该数据集涵盖了近10万名学者,并将他们的推特内容与学术记录相联系。我们记录了在气候行动、文化和经济概念等具有政治显著性的学术表达方面存在的巨大且系统的差异。我们表明,美国学者在话题焦点和风格上往往与广大美国推特用户不同,尽管学者们在信念上不一定更为极端。未来的研究应该考察对公众信任的潜在影响,以及学者在社交媒体上进行政治表达的原因。