Soleimani Najme, Wiafe Sir-Lord, Iraji Armin, Pearlson Godfrey, Calhoun Vince D
Tri-institutional Center for Translational Research in Neuroimaging and Data Science (TReNDS), Atlanta, GA.
Departments of Psychiatry and Neuroscience, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT.
bioRxiv. 2025 May 22:2025.05.20.655164. doi: 10.1101/2025.05.20.655164.
Identifying biomarkers- objective, quantifiable biologically-based measures to complement traditional clinical assessments- is critical for studying the links between brain and disorders. Recent advances in neuroimaging have shifted biomarker discovery from traditional univariate brain mapping techniques, which analyze individual brain regions separately, to multivariate predictive models that consider complex patterns across multiple regions, with dynamic functional network connectivity (dFNC) emerging as a key approach offering a dynamic view of the temporal coupling between different brain networks. Here, we introduce an innovative approach to estimate dynamic double functional independent primitives (ddFIP) by first applying a spatially constrained independent component analysis (ICA) to derive intrinsic connectivity networks (ICNs), followed by a second ICA applied to dFNC matrices. This procedure provides a set of "states" that reflect dynamic connectivity patterns. To characterize these states, we propose several dynamic measures: (1) amplitude convergence, which quantifies the extent to which multiple states contribute similarly to the connectivity profile at a given time (indicating more uniform state contributions); (2) amplitude divergence, quantifying the tendency for states to contribute at varying levels which does not assume dominance but rather reflects a spread of amplitudes across states; as well as (3) dynamic state density which shows the number of strongly occupied states, reflecting the brain's preference for spending time in a smaller or larger set of dominant states. We apply this approach to uncover ddFIP-based biomarkers from seven resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI) clinical datasets, which include four neuropsychiatric disorders-schizophrenia (SCZ), autism spectrum disorder (ASD), major depressive disorder (MDD), and bipolar disorder (BPD)- comprising a total of 5,805 participants. Our results revealed disorder-specific patterns in dynamic connectivity measures. SCZ exhibited widespread disruptions with high variability and increased divergence, suggesting a tendency for states to contribute at varying levels rather than uniformly. ASD, in contrast, showed significantly reduced divergence and increased convergence, indicating more uniform contributions across states and atypical stability in dynamic connectivity. BPD demonstrated heightened variability, particularly in mood regulation networks, while MDD displayed moderate disruptions, especially in self-referential processing networks. Notably, ASD's increased state convergence reflects a pattern where state weights are more similar, was sharply distinct from SCZ's increased divergence, as indicated by state occupancy measures. In sum, our findings highlight the potential of continuous dFNC as a FNC-based biomarker to capture disorder-specific connectivity signatures. Moreover, by analyzing both the convergence and divergence of dynamic states, we capture a detailed view of connectivity, reflecting the brain's adaptability and resilience within each disorder.
识别生物标志物——用于补充传统临床评估的基于生物学的客观、可量化指标——对于研究大脑与疾病之间的联系至关重要。神经影像学的最新进展已将生物标志物发现从传统的单变量脑图谱技术(分别分析各个脑区)转向多变量预测模型,后者考虑多个区域的复杂模式,动态功能网络连接性(dFNC)作为一种关键方法出现,它提供了不同脑网络之间时间耦合的动态视图。在此,我们介绍一种创新方法来估计动态双功能独立基元(ddFIP),首先应用空间约束独立成分分析(ICA)来推导内在连接网络(ICN),然后将第二个ICA应用于dFNC矩阵。这个过程提供了一组反映动态连接模式的“状态”。为了表征这些状态,我们提出了几种动态测量方法:(1)幅度收敛,量化多个状态在给定时间对连接配置文件的贡献相似程度(表明状态贡献更均匀);(2)幅度发散,量化状态以不同水平贡献的趋势,这并不假定占主导地位,而是反映幅度在不同状态间的分布;以及(3)动态状态密度,显示高度占据状态的数量,反映大脑在较小或较大一组主导状态中花费时间的偏好。我们将此方法应用于从七个静息态功能磁共振成像(rs-fMRI)临床数据集中发现基于ddFIP的生物标志物,这些数据集包括四种神经精神疾病——精神分裂症(SCZ)、自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)、重度抑郁症(MDD)和双相情感障碍(BPD)——总共5805名参与者。我们的结果揭示了动态连接测量中的疾病特异性模式。SCZ表现出广泛的破坏,具有高变异性和增加的发散性,表明状态倾向于以不同水平而非均匀地做出贡献。相比之下,ASD显示出发散性显著降低和收敛性增加,表明不同状态间的贡献更均匀,且动态连接具有非典型稳定性。BPD表现出更高的变异性,特别是在情绪调节网络中,而MDD表现出中度破坏,尤其是在自我参照加工网络中。值得注意的是,ASD增加的状态收敛反映了一种状态权重更相似的模式,与SCZ增加的发散性截然不同,如状态占据测量所示。总之,我们的发现突出了连续dFNC作为基于FNC的生物标志物来捕捉疾病特异性连接特征的潜力。此外,通过分析动态状态的收敛性和发散性,我们获得了连接性的详细视图,反映了每种疾病中大脑的适应性和恢复力。