• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估塞浦路斯的总体卫生系统:基于公众认知的问卷调查分析

Assessing the General Health System of Cyprus: a questionnaire analysis based on public perception.

作者信息

Evripides George, Christodoulides Paul

机构信息

Department of Electrical Engineering, Computer Engineering and Informatics, Cyprus University of Technology, Limassol, Cyprus.

Faculty of Engineering and Technology, Cyprus University of Technology, Limassol, Cyprus.

出版信息

Arch Public Health. 2025 Jul 4;83(1):178. doi: 10.1186/s13690-025-01654-9.

DOI:10.1186/s13690-025-01654-9
PMID:40615902
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12231704/
Abstract

A medical health system (MHS) can be viewed as a diverse network of organizations, experts, and resources devoted to promoting, maintaining, and restoring health and well-being in people and societies. There are numerous MHS throughout the world, and their success depends on a number of aspects that should be met. One such MHS is the newly established General Health System (GHS) of Cyprus, a blend of national HS and Social Health Insurance, supported by beneficiaries, employers, and the state. Following the results of a recent study, based on the same questionnaire, the aim of the present study is to attempt a further assessment on how the various factors (constructs) and demographic variables of people of Cyprus interact in their view of the GHS. The questionnaire was constructed on the basis of the available literature and the information gathered about MHS and their features. It includes 5-point Likert-scale items reflecting relevant factors such as Satisfaction (SAT), Trust (TRU), Reliability (REL), Expectations (EXP), Improvement factors (IMP), and Comparison of the Cyprus Health System before and after the implementation of GHS (COM), and others. The questionnaire was completed by 445 individuals in all districts of Cyprus between January and March of 2024. The descriptive statistics analysis of the questionnaires led to useful findings such as the particularly low mean values for the constructs of SAT, TRU and REL. Another finding is that there is not much variation in the mean values among the categories of groups such as gender, age, education level, annual income, work sector, and residence district. To this end an Analysis of Variance, followed by a multiple regression analysis on all constructs was done, in order to clarify/verify certain issues, which led to conclusions that can be used for the amelioration of the GHS. Demographic variables such as age group and income level have influences on all constructs mentioned above and must be tackled differently by GHS stakeholders. There is a strong correlation between SAT, TRU and REL and COM meaning that if one aims to make reforms on GHS targeting higher SAT, they should enhance TRU, REL, and COM.

摘要

医疗健康系统(MHS)可被视为一个由致力于促进、维持和恢复个人及社会健康与福祉的组织、专家和资源组成的多元化网络。世界各地有众多医疗健康系统,其成功取决于一些需要满足的方面。塞浦路斯新成立的综合健康系统(GHS)就是这样一个医疗健康系统,它融合了国家健康系统和社会医疗保险,得到了受益者、雇主和国家的支持。基于最近一项使用相同问卷的研究结果,本研究的目的是进一步评估塞浦路斯民众的各种因素(构成要素)和人口统计学变量在他们对综合健康系统的看法中是如何相互作用的。该问卷是根据现有文献以及收集到的有关医疗健康系统及其特征的信息构建的。它包括反映满意度(SAT)、信任度(TRU)、可靠性(REL)、期望(EXP)、改进因素(IMP)以及综合健康系统实施前后塞浦路斯健康系统比较(COM)等相关因素的5级李克特量表项目,以及其他项目。2024年1月至3月期间,塞浦路斯所有地区的445人完成了该问卷。对问卷的描述性统计分析得出了一些有用的结果,比如满意度、信任度和可靠性这些构成要素的均值特别低。另一个发现是,在性别、年龄、教育水平、年收入、工作部门和居住地区等群体类别中,均值没有太大差异。为此,进行了方差分析,随后对所有构成要素进行了多元回归分析,以澄清/验证某些问题,从而得出可用于改善综合健康系统的结论。年龄组和收入水平等人口统计学变量会对上述所有构成要素产生影响,综合健康系统的利益相关者必须区别对待。满意度、信任度和可靠性与系统比较之间存在很强的相关性,这意味着如果有人旨在针对更高的满意度对综合健康系统进行改革,就应该提高信任度、可靠性和系统比较。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3ae3/12231704/b72efd869274/13690_2025_1654_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3ae3/12231704/2c727b580e28/13690_2025_1654_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3ae3/12231704/b72efd869274/13690_2025_1654_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3ae3/12231704/2c727b580e28/13690_2025_1654_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3ae3/12231704/b72efd869274/13690_2025_1654_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Assessing the General Health System of Cyprus: a questionnaire analysis based on public perception.评估塞浦路斯的总体卫生系统:基于公众认知的问卷调查分析
Arch Public Health. 2025 Jul 4;83(1):178. doi: 10.1186/s13690-025-01654-9.
2
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
3
A New Measure of Quantified Social Health Is Associated With Levels of Discomfort, Capability, and Mental and General Health Among Patients Seeking Musculoskeletal Specialty Care.一种新的量化社会健康指标与寻求肌肉骨骼专科护理的患者的不适程度、能力以及心理和总体健康水平相关。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Apr 1;483(4):647-663. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003394. Epub 2025 Feb 5.
4
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
5
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.对紫杉醇、多西他赛、吉西他滨和长春瑞滨在非小细胞肺癌中的临床疗效和成本效益进行的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320.
6
The Black Book of Psychotropic Dosing and Monitoring.《精神药物剂量与监测黑皮书》
Psychopharmacol Bull. 2024 Jul 8;54(3):8-59.
7
"I Don't Understand Their Sense of Belonging": Exploring How Nonbinary Autistic Adults Experience Gender.“我不理解他们的归属感”:探索非二元性别的自闭症成年人如何体验性别。
Autism Adulthood. 2024 Dec 2;6(4):462-473. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0071. eCollection 2024 Dec.
8
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.在基层医疗机构或医院门诊环境中,如果患者出现以下症状和体征,可判断其是否患有 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.
9
Parents' and informal caregivers' views and experiences of communication about routine childhood vaccination: a synthesis of qualitative evidence.父母及非正式照料者关于儿童常规疫苗接种沟通的观点与经历:定性证据综述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 7;2(2):CD011787. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011787.pub2.
10
The quantity, quality and findings of network meta-analyses evaluating the effectiveness of GLP-1 RAs for weight loss: a scoping review.评估胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂(GLP-1 RAs)减肥效果的网状Meta分析的数量、质量及结果:一项范围综述
Health Technol Assess. 2025 Jun 25:1-73. doi: 10.3310/SKHT8119.

本文引用的文献

1
Health system strengthening in fragile and conflict-affected states: A review of systematic reviews.脆弱和受冲突影响国家的卫生系统强化:系统评价综述。
PLoS One. 2024 Jun 14;19(6):e0305234. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0305234. eCollection 2024.
2
Healthcare Systems across Europe and the US: The Managed Entry Agreements Experience.欧洲和美国的医疗保健系统:有条件准入协议的经验
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Feb 3;11(3):447. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11030447.
3
How do we design and evaluate health system strengthening? Collaborative development of a set of health system process goals.
我们如何设计和评估卫生系统强化?一组卫生系统过程目标的协作式制定。
Int J Health Plann Manage. 2023 Mar;38(2):279-288. doi: 10.1002/hpm.3607. Epub 2022 Dec 28.
4
The 2019 introduction of the new National Healthcare System in Cyprus.2019 年塞浦路斯新国家医疗体系的引入。
Health Policy. 2021 Mar;125(3):284-289. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2020.12.018. Epub 2021 Jan 4.
5
Patient Satisfaction With Medical Services Provided at Unani Medicine Hospital, Bengaluru: A Cross-Sectional Study.班加罗尔尤纳尼医学医院提供的医疗服务的患者满意度:一项横断面研究。
J Patient Exp. 2020 Dec;7(6):1432-1437. doi: 10.1177/2374373520969001. Epub 2020 Nov 5.
6
Health care seeking for maternal and newborn illnesses in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review of observational and qualitative studies.低收入和中等收入国家孕产妇和新生儿疾病的就医情况:观察性研究和定性研究的系统评价
F1000Res. 2019 Feb 19;8:200. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.17828.1. eCollection 2019.
7
An evaluation of health systems equity in Indonesia: study protocol.印度尼西亚卫生系统公平性评价:研究方案。
Int J Equity Health. 2018 Sep 12;17(1):138. doi: 10.1186/s12939-018-0822-0.
8
Principles of Interim Analysis.期中分析的原则
J Assoc Physicians India. 2017 Sep;65(9):78-83.
9
A study on satisfaction with publicly financed health services in China.一项关于中国公共财政资助医疗服务满意度的研究。
Global Health. 2017 Aug 28;13(1):67. doi: 10.1186/s12992-017-0292-y.
10
Principles of Correlation Analysis.相关性分析原理。
J Assoc Physicians India. 2017 Mar;65(3):78-81.