Zhang Meng Xuan, Zhang Hengyue, Wu Anise M S
Department of Medical Humanities, School of Humanities, Southeast University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
Psychological Research & Education Center, School of Humanities, Southeast University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
J Korean Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2025 Jul 1;36(3):152-162. doi: 10.5765/jkacap.250020.
While childhood experiences have been well-recognized as salient predictors of addictive behaviors, this scoping review aims to evaluate whether life history (LH) theory can offer a valid and reliable theoretical framework for elucidating the influence of childhood environment on problematic smartphone use (PSU). In particular, it examines existing empirical evidence to clarify the underlying internal processes, if any, from the LH perspective.
Following the PRISMA guidelines, a scoping review was conducted by searching 5 databases and screening relevant studies on February 18, 2025.
Five articles, all of which were published in the last three years, met the inclusion criteria. Consistent empirical data were found in these five articles indicating the following: 1) significant correlations between childhood environment and PSU, with contradictory directions for the two dimensions of childhood environment; 2) LH strategy serving as a mediator between childhood environment and PSU; and 3) psychological processes, including motivation, emotion, and cognition, playing a role in the mediation, and their effects can be complex. It also identified some limitations of these studies, all of which were conducted as cross-sectional surveys of Chinese youth samples.
Despite being limited in number and design, empirical studies provide coherent support for the applicability of LH theory in understanding how childhood environment determines susceptibility to PSU in youth. Further investigation of the role(s) of other internal processes with multimodal and multi-method designs is called for.
虽然童年经历已被公认为成瘾行为的重要预测因素,但本综述旨在评估生活史(LH)理论是否能为阐明童年环境对问题智能手机使用(PSU)的影响提供一个有效且可靠的理论框架。具体而言,它从LH的角度审视现有实证证据,以厘清潜在的内在过程(若有的话)。
遵循PRISMA指南,于2025年2月18日通过检索5个数据库并筛选相关研究进行了一项综述。
五篇均在过去三年发表的文章符合纳入标准。在这五篇文章中发现了一致的实证数据,表明如下情况:1)童年环境与PSU之间存在显著相关性,且童年环境的两个维度方向相互矛盾;2)LH策略在童年环境与PSU之间起中介作用;3)心理过程,包括动机、情感和认知,在中介过程中发挥作用,且其影响可能很复杂。还指出了这些研究的一些局限性,所有这些研究均为对中国青年样本的横断面调查。
尽管在数量和设计上存在局限,但实证研究为LH理论在理解童年环境如何决定青少年对PSU的易感性方面的适用性提供了连贯的支持。需要采用多模式和多方法设计对其他内在过程的作用进行进一步研究。