• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Participatory Health Impact Assessment for Health and Well-Being Policy at Local Level in Thailand.泰国地方层面健康与福祉政策的参与式健康影响评估
Health Promot J Austr. 2025 Jul;36(3):e70073. doi: 10.1002/hpja.70073.
2
Participation in environmental enhancement and conservation activities for health and well-being in adults: a review of quantitative and qualitative evidence.成年人参与促进环境改善和保护活动对健康与福祉的影响:定量和定性证据综述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 May 21;2016(5):CD010351. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010351.pub2.
3
Stakeholders' perceptions and experiences of factors influencing the commissioning, delivery, and uptake of general health checks: a qualitative evidence synthesis.利益相关者对影响一般健康检查的委托、提供和接受因素的看法与体验:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Mar 20;3(3):CD014796. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014796.pub2.
4
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
5
Consumers' and health providers' views and perceptions of partnering to improve health services design, delivery and evaluation: a co-produced qualitative evidence synthesis.消费者和卫生服务提供者对合作改善卫生服务设计、提供和评估的看法和认知:一项共同制定的定性证据综合研究。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Mar 14;3(3):CD013274. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013274.pub2.
6
Addressing Inequalities in Long Covid Healthcare: A Mixed-Methods Study on Building Inclusive Services.解决长期新冠医疗保健中的不平等问题:一项关于建立包容性服务的混合方法研究。
Health Expect. 2025 Aug;28(4):e70336. doi: 10.1111/hex.70336.
7
"I Don't Understand Their Sense of Belonging": Exploring How Nonbinary Autistic Adults Experience Gender.“我不理解他们的归属感”:探索非二元性别的自闭症成年人如何体验性别。
Autism Adulthood. 2024 Dec 2;6(4):462-473. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0071. eCollection 2024 Dec.
8
Co-creating mental health promotion and prevention interventions with groups in vulnerable situations in Europe: a mixed-methods study protocol for co-creation implementation and participatory evaluation.与欧洲弱势群体共同创建心理健康促进与预防干预措施:一项关于共同创建实施和参与性评估的混合方法研究方案
Health Res Policy Syst. 2025 Jul 1;23(1):87. doi: 10.1186/s12961-025-01349-1.
9
How to Implement Digital Clinical Consultations in UK Maternity Care: the ARM@DA Realist Review.如何在英国产科护理中实施数字临床会诊:ARM@DA实证主义综述
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 May 21:1-77. doi: 10.3310/WQFV7425.
10
Feasibility study of Learning Together for Mental Health: fidelity, reach and acceptability of a whole-school intervention aiming to promote health and wellbeing in secondary schools.“共同学习促进心理健康”可行性研究:一项旨在促进中学健康与幸福的全校性干预措施的保真度、覆盖面和可接受性。
Public Health Res (Southampt). 2025 Jun 18:1-36. doi: 10.3310/RTRT0202.

本文引用的文献

1
Local government's roles in community health and wellbeing in Australia: Insights from Tasmania.澳大利亚地方政府在社区健康和福祉中的作用:塔斯马尼亚的观点。
Health Promot J Austr. 2024 Oct;35(4):1035-1044. doi: 10.1002/hpja.831. Epub 2023 Dec 4.
2
Rainbow Wash or Rainbow Revolution? Dynamic Stakeholder Engagement for SDG-Driven Responsible Innovation.彩虹清洗还是彩虹革命?由可持续发展目标驱动的负责任创新的动态利益相关者参与。
J Bus Ethics. 2022;180(4):1113-1136. doi: 10.1007/s10551-022-05190-2. Epub 2022 Jul 20.
3
Health impact assessment of local policies: methodology and tools.地方政策的健康影响评估:方法与工具
Glob Health Promot. 2023 Mar;30(1):7-15. doi: 10.1177/17579759221107031. Epub 2022 Jul 19.
4
Food system policy making and innovation at the local level: Exploring the response of Australian local governments to critical food systems issues.地方层面的食品系统政策制定与创新:探究澳大利亚地方政府对关键食品系统问题的应对措施。
Health Promot J Austr. 2023 Apr;34(2):488-499. doi: 10.1002/hpja.626. Epub 2022 Jun 19.
5
A decade of health-care decentralization in Thailand: what lessons can be drawn?泰国医疗保健权力下放十年:能吸取哪些经验教训?
WHO South East Asia J Public Health. 2012 Jul-Sep;1(3):347-356. doi: 10.4103/2224-3151.207031.
6
Health impact assessment for health promotion, education and learning.
Glob Health Promot. 2017 Jun;24(2):3-4. doi: 10.1177/1757975917704614. Epub 2017 May 30.
7
Health impact assessment (HIA) of political proposals at the local level: successful introduction, but what has happened 15 years later?地方层面政治提案的健康影响评估:成功引入,但15年后情况如何?
Glob Health Promot. 2017 Jun;24(2):43-51. doi: 10.1177/1757975916683386. Epub 2017 Apr 24.
8
Effectiveness of Health Impact Assessments: A Synthesis of Data From Five Impact Evaluation Reports.健康影响评估的有效性:来自五份影响评估报告的数据综合
Prev Chronic Dis. 2016 Jun 30;13:E84. doi: 10.5888/pcd13.150559.
9
Using evidence in health promotion in local government: contextual realities and opportunities.在地方政府的健康促进中使用证据:背景现实与机遇。
Health Promot J Austr. 2013 Apr;24(1):72-5. doi: 10.1071/HE12902.
10
The role of health impact assessment in promoting population health and health equity.健康影响评估在促进人群健康和健康公平中的作用。
Health Promot J Austr. 2009 Dec;20(3):172-9. doi: 10.1071/he09172.

泰国地方层面健康与福祉政策的参与式健康影响评估

Participatory Health Impact Assessment for Health and Well-Being Policy at Local Level in Thailand.

作者信息

Promthong Nattaya, Thaweesook Suwicha, Sukmak Phen, Mongkolsomlit Sirima, Jaidee Patchana Hengboriboonpong, Putthasri Weerasak

机构信息

National Health Commission Office, Nonthaburi, Thailand.

Public Policy Institute, Prince of Songkhla University, Songkhla, Thailand.

出版信息

Health Promot J Austr. 2025 Jul;36(3):e70073. doi: 10.1002/hpja.70073.

DOI:10.1002/hpja.70073
PMID:40653383
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12256213/
Abstract

ISSUE ADDRESSED

Achieving the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) related to health and well-being requires diverse stakeholders' engagement. According to Thailand's constitution, the decentralisation of health promotion to Local Administrative Organizations (LAOs) has been increasingly implemented. The lessons learned from experiences in implementing well-being tools and engaging stakeholders in diverse local and cultural contexts offer practical benefits. This article describes the development of participatory policy using health impact assessment (HIA) in selected LAOs across Thailand, alongside bottom-up policy formulation, to support sustainable social well-being and community empowerment.

METHODS

A qualitative research approach was applied to examine HIA implementation in 12 purposively selected LAOs across Thailand. Data collection included document reviews, participatory observations of HIA meetings/activities and 156 in-depth interviews with key informants (KIs) who were actively involved in the HIA process. The analysis specifically examined the roles of community and stakeholder engagement, the implementation processes and the resulting outcomes.

RESULTS

The 12 LAOs selected a diverse range of challenges for HIA applications, including waste management, water pollution, elderly care, occupational health and community tourism. Community consultation with government personnel, academics and community members was conducted as the preparation phase to identify priority issues. Most participants emphasised that meaningful and inclusive participation through the HIA process was crucial for creating ownership and ensuring compliance with agreements. The influencing step of HIA was significant in securing commitment and continued support from local governments. Participants also mentioned increased motivation, active citizenship, community empowerment and collective leadership development.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings indicate that the HIA is a social tool effectively implemented in the community. Various issues and challenges of health and well-being are manifest in deployment. SO WHAT?: Inclusive participation through the policy development process at the local level is clarity to support sustainable social well-being and community empowerment.

摘要

解决的问题

实现与健康和福祉相关的可持续发展目标需要不同利益相关者的参与。根据泰国宪法,促进健康的权力下放已越来越多地落实到地方行政组织(LAO)。从在不同地方和文化背景下实施福祉工具及让利益相关者参与的经验中吸取的教训具有实际益处。本文描述了泰国部分地方行政组织如何通过健康影响评估(HIA)并结合自下而上的政策制定来制定参与性政策,以支持可持续的社会福祉和社区赋权。

方法

采用定性研究方法,对泰国12个经过有目的选择的地方行政组织中健康影响评估的实施情况进行研究。数据收集包括文件审查、对健康影响评估会议/活动的参与式观察以及对积极参与健康影响评估过程的156名关键信息提供者(KI)进行深度访谈。分析具体考察了社区和利益相关者参与的作用、实施过程及产生结果。

结果

12个地方行政组织为健康影响评估应用选择了一系列不同的挑战,包括废物管理、水污染、老年护理、职业健康和社区旅游。作为准备阶段,与政府人员、学者和社区成员进行了社区协商,以确定优先问题。大多数参与者强调,通过健康影响评估过程进行有意义和包容性的参与对于建立主人翁意识和确保遵守协议至关重要。健康影响评估的影响步骤在获得地方政府的承诺和持续支持方面具有重要意义。参与者还提到积极性提高、积极公民意识增强、社区赋权和集体领导力发展。

结论

研究结果表明,健康影响评估是一种在社区中有效实施的社会工具。在部署过程中体现了健康和福祉的各种问题及挑战。那么又如何呢?:在地方层面通过政策制定过程进行包容性参与显然有助于支持可持续的社会福祉和社区赋权。