Jiang Hongning, Han Aiyun, Zhang Yangdong, Li Yanxin, Jiang Chao, Du Qijing, Fan Rongbo, Yang Yongxin, Han Rongwei
College of Food Science and Engineering, Qingdao Agricultural University, Qingdao, China.
Shijiazhuang Food Engineering Technology Innovation Center, Shijiazhuang College, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China.
Front Microbiol. 2025 Jul 17;16:1586662. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2025.1586662. eCollection 2025.
Bacterial proteomics is a pivotal tool for elucidating microbial physiology and pathogenicity. The efficiency and reliability of proteomic analyses are highly dependent on the protein extraction methodology, which directly influences the detectable proteome. In this study, we systematically compared four protein extraction protocols-SDT lysis buffer with boiling (SDT-B), SDT lysis buffer with ultrasonication (SDT-U/S), a combination of boiling and ultrasonication (SDT-B-U/S), and SDT lysis buffer with liquid nitrogen grinding followed by ultrasonication (SDT-LNG-U/S)-to evaluate their effects on peptide and protein identification, distribution, and reproducibility in and . Both data-dependent acquisition (DDA) and data-independent acquisition (DIA) strategies were employed for comprehensive proteomic profiling. DDA analysis identified 23,912 unique peptides corresponding to 2,141 proteins in and 13,150 unique peptides corresponding to 1,511 proteins in . DIA analysis yielded slightly fewer peptides (21,027 for and 7,707 for ) but demonstrated superior reproducibility. Among the tested protocols, SDT-B-U/S outperformed the others, identifying 16,560 peptides for and 10,575 peptides for in DDA mode. It also exhibited the highest technical replicate correlation in DIA analysis ( = 0.92). This method enhanced the extraction of proteins within key molecular weight ranges (20-30 kDa for ; 10-40 kDa for ) and was particularly effective for recovering membrane proteins (e.g., OmpC). Additionally, ultrasonication-based protocols outperformed the liquid nitrogen grinding approach in extracting the proteome. These findings underscore the significant impact of protein extraction methods on bacterial proteomics. The SDT-B-U/S protocol-thermal denaturation followed by ultrasonication-proved most effective, enhancing protein recovery and reproducibility across both Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria. This work offers key guidance for optimizing microbial proteomic workflows.
细菌蛋白质组学是阐明微生物生理学和致病性的关键工具。蛋白质组分析的效率和可靠性高度依赖于蛋白质提取方法,该方法直接影响可检测的蛋白质组。在本研究中,我们系统地比较了四种蛋白质提取方案——煮沸的SDT裂解缓冲液(SDT-B)、超声处理的SDT裂解缓冲液(SDT-U/S)、煮沸和超声处理相结合的方案(SDT-B-U/S)以及液氮研磨后超声处理的SDT裂解缓冲液(SDT-LNG-U/S)——以评估它们对肽段和蛋白质鉴定、分布以及在[具体实验对象1]和[具体实验对象2]中的重现性的影响。数据依赖型采集(DDA)和数据非依赖型采集(DIA)策略均用于全面的蛋白质组分析。DDA分析在[具体实验对象1]中鉴定出对应于2141种蛋白质的23912个独特肽段,在[具体实验对象2]中鉴定出对应于1511种蛋白质的13150个独特肽段。DIA分析产生的肽段略少([具体实验对象1]为21027个,[具体实验对象2]为7707个),但显示出更高的重现性。在测试的方案中,SDT-B-U/S表现优于其他方案,在DDA模式下,[具体实验对象1]鉴定出16560个肽段,[具体实验对象2]鉴定出10575个肽段。它在DIA分析中也表现出最高的技术重复相关性([相关系数具体值] = 0.92)。该方法增强了关键分子量范围内蛋白质的提取([具体实验对象1]为20 - 30 kDa;[具体实验对象2]为10 - 40 kDa),并且对于回收膜蛋白(如OmpC)特别有效。此外,基于超声处理的方案在提取[具体实验对象2]蛋白质组方面优于液氮研磨方法。这些发现强调了蛋白质提取方法对细菌蛋白质组学的重大影响。SDT-B-U/S方案——热变性后超声处理——被证明是最有效的,提高了革兰氏阴性菌和革兰氏阳性菌的蛋白质回收率和重现性。这项工作为优化微生物蛋白质组工作流程提供了关键指导。