Torres-Rojo Flor Isela, Enríquez-Del Castillo Liliana Aracely, González-Chávez Susana Aidée, Flores-Olivares Luis Alberto, Quintana-Mendias Estefanía, Carrasco-Legleu Claudia Esther
Facultad de Ciencias Químicas, Universidad Autónoma de Chihuahua, Chihuahua, Chihuahua, México.
Facultad de Ciencias de la Cultura Física, Universidad Autónoma de Chihuahua, Chihuahua, Chihuahua, México.
PLoS One. 2025 Aug 20;20(8):e0330185. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0330185. eCollection 2025.
This meta-analysis aimed to establish the effect of vigorous and non-vigorous exercise interventions on biomarkers of redox status in healthy adults.
Based on the PRISMA guidelines, we searched the following databases: Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed, Springer, Science Direct, Cochrane Library, Dialnet, Redalyc, and Lilacs for randomized controlled clinical trials investigating the effect of non-vigorous and vigorous chronic exercise in healthy adults, with the evaluation of antioxidants. The quality of evidence and risk of biases were assessed using the PEDro scale and version 2 of the Cochrane tool for risk of bias assessment in randomized trials (RoB2).
Seven randomized clinical trials evaluating nine training protocols were included (n=267). Individual evaluations demonstrated an increase in antioxidant capacity (I2=0%, Z=4.56, p<0.00001) and superoxide dismutase (I2=52%, Z=1.94, p=0.05), an antioxidant enzyme, and decrease in pro-oxidant (I2=0%, Z=5.91, p<0.0001); there was no significant difference in glutathione peroxidase (I2=81%, Z=0.50, p=0.62). The effect of vigorous interventions showed an increase in antioxidants (Z=2.44, I2=67%, p=0.01) and a decrease in oxidants (Z=5.44, I2=0%, p<0.00001), while in non-vigorous exercise, no significant differences were observed in redox status.
The vigorous physical exercise presented better results on antioxidant and oxidative capacity compared to non-vigorous intensity training protocols in healthy people. Finding the optimal balance between exercise intensity and oxidative stress is crucial for maximizing the production of antioxidant enzymes, which can enhance physiological function and increase resistance to OS.
本荟萃分析旨在确定剧烈运动和非剧烈运动干预对健康成年人氧化还原状态生物标志物的影响。
根据PRISMA指南,我们检索了以下数据库:Scopus、科学网、PubMed、施普林格、科学Direct、考科蓝图书馆、Dialnet、Redalyc和Lilacs,以查找调查非剧烈和剧烈慢性运动对健康成年人影响并评估抗氧化剂的随机对照临床试验。使用PEDro量表和考科蓝随机试验偏倚风险评估工具第2版(RoB2)评估证据质量和偏倚风险。
纳入了7项评估9种训练方案的随机临床试验(n = 267)。个体评估显示抗氧化能力增加(I2 = 0%,Z = 4.56,p < 0.00001)和超氧化物歧化酶增加(I2 = 52%,Z = 1.94,p = 0.05),超氧化物歧化酶是一种抗氧化酶,促氧化剂减少(I2 = 0%,Z = 5.91,p < 0.0001);谷胱甘肽过氧化物酶无显著差异(I2 = 81%,Z = 0.50,p = 0.62)。剧烈干预的效果显示抗氧化剂增加(Z = 2.44,I2 = 67%,p = 0.01)和氧化剂减少(Z = 5.44,I2 = 0%,p < 0.00001),而在非剧烈运动中,氧化还原状态未观察到显著差异。
与健康人的非剧烈强度训练方案相比,剧烈体育锻炼在抗氧化和氧化能力方面呈现出更好的结果。在运动强度和氧化应激之间找到最佳平衡对于最大限度地产生抗氧化酶至关重要,这可以增强生理功能并增加对氧化应激的抵抗力。