• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

奥尔胡斯髋臼周围截骨术数据库的验证

Validation of the Aarhus periacetabular osteotomy database.

作者信息

Tønning Lisa, Foldager Frederik, Larsen Josefine, Kristensen Pia, Mechlenburg Inger, Søballe Kjeld, Jakobsen Stig

机构信息

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.

Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.

出版信息

Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2025 Aug 28;145(1):427. doi: 10.1007/s00402-025-05978-7.

DOI:10.1007/s00402-025-05978-7
PMID:40875046
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12394341/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) is the preferred surgical treatment for hip dysplasia. In Denmark, patients undergoing PAO at two orthopaedic departments are registered in a disease registry, the Aarhus PAO-database. This study aimed to validate the Aarhus PAO-database by assessing the registration completeness compared to the Danish National Patient Registry (DNPR).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients registered in the Aarhus PAO-database were compared to patients identified in DNPR as having undergone PAO for hip dysplasia. Further, a random selection of 20 PAO procedures from each registry per year (2014-2021) was validated by comparing the information from the registries to the hospital's electronic medical records.

RESULTS

Between 2014 and 2021, 1144 PAO procedures were registered in the Aarhus PAO-database and 1150 in DNPR. The overall registration completeness was 94.7% (95% CI: 93.3;95.9) with 1116 PAO proceduresincluded in both datasets. The diagnosis and surgery procedure were verified as hip dysplasia and PAO for all randomly selected patients, and almost all discrepancies were resolved (> 95%), using the medical records.

CONCLUSION

The Aarhus PAO-database has effectively captured all patients who underwent PAO for hip dysplasia from 2014 to 2021. It appears to be a valid resource for future research as well as for ensuring and improving the quality of hip dysplasia treatment.

摘要

背景

髋臼周围截骨术(PAO)是治疗髋关节发育不良的首选手术方法。在丹麦,两个骨科部门接受PAO手术的患者被登记在一个疾病登记处,即奥胡斯PAO数据库。本研究旨在通过与丹麦国家患者登记处(DNPR)比较评估登记完整性,从而验证奥胡斯PAO数据库。

材料与方法

将奥胡斯PAO数据库中登记的患者与DNPR中确定为因髋关节发育不良接受PAO手术的患者进行比较。此外,通过将登记处的信息与医院的电子病历进行比较,对每年(2014 - 2021年)从每个登记处随机选取的20例PAO手术进行验证。

结果

2014年至2021年期间,奥胡斯PAO数据库登记了1144例PAO手术,DNPR登记了1150例。总体登记完整性为94.7%(95%CI:93.3;95.9),两个数据集共纳入1116例PAO手术。对于所有随机选取的患者,诊断和手术过程经核实为髋关节发育不良和PAO,并且几乎所有差异(>95%)都通过病历得到了解决。

结论

奥胡斯PAO数据库有效地记录了2014年至2021年期间所有因髋关节发育不良接受PAO手术的患者。它似乎是未来研究以及确保和提高髋关节发育不良治疗质量的有效资源。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7b4/12394341/cfbd8e968ed5/402_2025_5978_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7b4/12394341/cfbd8e968ed5/402_2025_5978_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7b4/12394341/cfbd8e968ed5/402_2025_5978_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Validation of the Aarhus periacetabular osteotomy database.奥尔胡斯髋臼周围截骨术数据库的验证
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2025 Aug 28;145(1):427. doi: 10.1007/s00402-025-05978-7.
2
Can We Enhance Shared Decision-making for Periacetabular Osteotomy Surgery? A Qualitative Study of Patient Experiences.我们能否加强髋臼周围截骨术的共同决策?一项关于患者体验的定性研究。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Jan 1;483(1):120-136. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003198. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
3
Is Prior Nonoperative or Operative Treatment of Dysplasia of the Hip Associated With Poorer Results of Periacetabular Osteotomy?髋关节发育不良的术前或术后治疗是否与髋臼周围截骨术的结果较差相关?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Nov 1;482(11):1987-1996. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003150. Epub 2024 Jun 25.
4
Does Periacetabular Osteotomy Change Sagittal Spinopelvic Alignment?髋臼周围截骨术是否改变矢状位脊柱骨盆排列?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Sep 1;482(9):1659-1667. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003031. Epub 2024 Apr 2.
5
Periacetabular osteotomy for acetabular retroversion: A systematic review and meta-analysis.髋臼旋转截骨术治疗髋臼后倾:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2021 Dec;107(8):103078. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2021.103078. Epub 2021 Sep 25.
6
Hip Dysplasia Treated With Periacetabular Osteotomy in Patients Over 40 Years Old: A Systematic Review.40 岁以上患者行髋臼周围截骨术治疗髋关节发育不良:系统评价。
Iowa Orthop J. 2024;44(1):105-112.
7
Periacetabular Osteotomy versus Total Hip Arthroplasty for Symptomatic Acetabular Dysplasia in Patients Aged 40 Years or Above.40岁及以上有症状的髋臼发育不良患者行髋臼周围截骨术与全髋关节置换术的比较
J Arthroplasty. 2025 Aug;40(8S1):S216-S221. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2025.04.051. Epub 2025 Apr 28.
8
Hip survivorship following the Bernese periacetabular osteotomy for the treatment of acetabular dysplasia: A systematic review and meta-analysis.髋关节发育不良保髋治疗的研究进展:髋臼周围截骨术的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2022 Jun;108(4):103283. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2022.103283. Epub 2022 Apr 22.
9
How Is Variability in Femoral and Acetabular Version Associated With Presentation Among Young Adults With Hip Pain?年轻人髋关节疼痛时股骨和髋臼版本的变化与表现有何关联?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Sep 1;482(9):1565-1579. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003076. Epub 2024 May 7.
10
Patient-Reported Outcomes After Periacetabular Osteotomy Versus Hip Arthroscopy for Borderline Acetabular Dysplasia Are Both Favorable: A Systematic Review.髋臼周围截骨术与髋关节镜治疗边缘性髋臼发育不良的患者报告结局均良好:一项系统评价。
Arthroscopy. 2025 Aug;41(8):3079-3093.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2024.11.090. Epub 2024 Dec 11.

本文引用的文献

1
Morphology of the dysplastic hip and the relationship with sex and acetabular version.发育异常髋关节的形态及其与性别和髋臼旋转角的关系。
Clin Anat. 2025 Jul;38(5):512-522. doi: 10.1002/ca.24174. Epub 2024 May 8.
2
Pain, function and quality of life are impaired in adults undergoing periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) for hip dysplasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.髋臼周围截骨术(PAO)治疗髋关节发育不良会导致成年人疼痛、功能和生活质量受损:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Hip Int. 2024 Jan;34(1):96-114. doi: 10.1177/11207000231179610. Epub 2023 Jun 12.
3
Physical impairments in Adults with Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip (DDH) undergoing Periacetabular osteotomy (PAO): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
接受髋臼周围截骨术(PAO)的发育性髋关节发育不良(DDH)成人患者的身体损伤:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2022 Oct 1;17(6):988-1001. doi: 10.26603/001c.38166. eCollection 2022.
4
Is the Femoral-Epiphyseal Acetabular Roof (FEAR) index associated with hip pain in patients with hip dysplasia?股骨骨骺髋臼顶(FEAR)指数与髋关节发育不良患者的髋部疼痛有关吗?
Acta Radiol. 2023 Feb;64(2):666-674. doi: 10.1177/02841851221093840. Epub 2022 May 11.
5
14-year hip survivorship after periacetabular osteotomy: a follow-up study on 1,385 hips.14 年髋臼周围截骨术后髋关节存活率:1385 髋随访研究。
Acta Orthop. 2020 Jun;91(3):299-305. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2020.1731159. Epub 2020 Feb 28.
6
The Positive Predictive Value of Hip Fracture Diagnoses and Surgical Procedure Codes in the Danish Multidisciplinary Hip Fracture Registry and the Danish National Patient Registry.丹麦多学科髋部骨折登记处及丹麦国家患者登记处中髋部骨折诊断和外科手术编码的阳性预测值
Clin Epidemiol. 2020 Feb 4;12:123-131. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S238722. eCollection 2020.
7
The Danish health care system and epidemiological research: from health care contacts to database records.丹麦医疗保健系统与流行病学研究:从医疗保健接触到数据库记录。
Clin Epidemiol. 2019 Jul 12;11:563-591. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S179083. eCollection 2019.
8
The REDCap consortium: Building an international community of software platform partners.REDCap 联盟:构建软件平台合作伙伴的国际社区。
J Biomed Inform. 2019 Jul;95:103208. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103208. Epub 2019 May 9.
9
Are changes in pain associated with changes in quality of life and hip function 2 years after periacetabular osteotomy? A follow-up study of 321 patients.髋臼周围截骨术后2年,疼痛的变化是否与生活质量和髋关节功能的变化相关?一项对321例患者的随访研究。
J Hip Preserv Surg. 2019 Mar 14;6(1):69-76. doi: 10.1093/jhps/hnz009. eCollection 2019 Jan.
10
The association between gender and familial prevalence of hip dysplasia in Danish patients.丹麦患者中性别与髋关节发育不良家族患病率之间的关联。
Hip Int. 2017 May 12;27(3):299-304. doi: 10.5301/hipint.5000461. Epub 2017 Feb 3.