• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中国湖南省生态系统服务束的时空稳定性格局及其驱动因素

Spatiotemporal stability patterns of ecosystem service bundles and their driving factors in Hunan Province, China.

作者信息

Zhan Yang, Wang Xu, Mao Yi-Xin, Yun Li-Li, Peng Xi

机构信息

Liaoning Academy of Forestry Science, Shenyang 110032, China.

Liaoning Baishilazi Forest Ecosystem Research Station, Kuandian 118201, Liaoning, China.

出版信息

Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2025 Aug;36(8):2442-2454. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202508.026.

DOI:10.13287/j.1001-9332.202508.026
PMID:40887693
Abstract

Integrated management of ecosystem services through ecosystem service bundles (ESBs) is increasingly recognized as one of the most promising approaches for optimizing ecosystem services. Understanding the spatiotemporal dynamics of ESBs is critical for developing precise and adaptive regional ecosystem management strategies. However, most existing studies focus on the static identification of ESBs, with limited attention to the long-term stability and underlying drivers. With Hunan Province as an example and based on the spatiotemporal evolution of six key ecosystem services from 1995 to 2020, we introduced the "dominant service cluster change frequency" indicator to quantify the spatiotemporal stability of ESBs, and established an explanatory framework for the stability dri-ving mechanism. The results showed that food production, carbon sequestration, and soil retention significantly increased, habitat quality remained relatively stable, while flood regulation and water yield declined. The spatial patterns of multiple service types also underwent significant change during 1995-2020. ESBs showed high spatial heterogeneity and temporal dynamics, with 58.2% of the area showing high transition frequency and only 41.8% remaining relatively stable. High stability regions were mainly located in plains and mountainous forest areas with high levels of agricultural intensification. Geographic detector analysis revealed that land-use factors (e.g., cropland and forest ratios) and climate variables (e.g., precipitation and temperature) were the primary drivers of ESB stability. The interaction effects between land use and climate were stronger than single-factor effects. Based on the stability classifications, we further proposed adaptive and region-specific ecosystem management strategies to provide a new path for improving the ability to sustain service supply and the timeliness of policy implementation. This study would expand the perspective of dynamic regulation in the study of ESBs, providing theoretical support and practical basis for the refined management of ecosystem multifunctionality in changing environments.

摘要

通过生态系统服务束(ESB)对生态系统服务进行综合管理,日益被视为优化生态系统服务最具前景的方法之一。了解ESB的时空动态对于制定精确且适应性强的区域生态系统管理策略至关重要。然而,大多数现有研究侧重于ESB的静态识别,对长期稳定性和潜在驱动因素的关注有限。以湖南省为例,基于1995年至2020年六种关键生态系统服务的时空演变,我们引入“主导服务簇变化频率”指标来量化ESB的时空稳定性,并建立了稳定性驱动机制的解释框架。结果表明,粮食生产、碳固存和土壤保持显著增加,栖息地质量保持相对稳定,而洪水调节和产水量下降。1995 - 2020年期间,多种服务类型的空间格局也发生了显著变化。ESB表现出高度的空间异质性和时间动态性,58.2%的区域显示出高转变频率,仅有41.8%保持相对稳定。高稳定性区域主要位于农业集约化程度高的平原和山区森林地区。地理探测器分析表明,土地利用因素(如耕地和森林比例)和气候变量(如降水和温度)是ESB稳定性的主要驱动因素。土地利用与气候之间的交互作用比单因素作用更强。基于稳定性分类,我们进一步提出了适应性和区域特定的生态系统管理策略,为提高服务供给维持能力和政策实施及时性提供了新途径。本研究将拓展ESB研究中动态调控的视角,为变化环境中生态系统多功能性的精细化管理提供理论支持和实践依据。

相似文献

1
Spatiotemporal stability patterns of ecosystem service bundles and their driving factors in Hunan Province, China.中国湖南省生态系统服务束的时空稳定性格局及其驱动因素
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2025 Aug;36(8):2442-2454. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202508.026.
2
Trade-offs and synergies of ecosystem services in Anhui Province, China based on functional zone identification.基于功能区识别的中国安徽省生态系统服务的权衡与协同作用
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2025 Jun;36(6):1616-1626. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202506.026.
3
Spatiotemporal characteristics and drivers of ecosystem service interactions in the Dongting Lake Basin.洞庭湖流域生态系统服务相互作用的时空特征及其驱动因素。
Sci Total Environ. 2024 May 20;926:172012. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.172012. Epub 2024 Mar 28.
4
Exploring the spatial heterogeneity of trade-offs and synergies across ecosystem service bundles based on supply and demand relationships in the Wuhan Metropolitan Area.基于武汉都市圈供需关系探索生态系统服务束间权衡与协同的空间异质性。
Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2025 Sep 1;21(5):1025-1038. doi: 10.1093/inteam/vjaf066.
5
Influencing factors of ecosystem services and their spatiotemporal change assessment based on land use in Rwanda.基于卢旺达土地利用的生态系统服务影响因素及其时空变化评估
Environ Monit Assess. 2025 Jun 3;197(7):721. doi: 10.1007/s10661-025-14169-1.
6
[Spatial-temporal Differentiation Characteristics and Influencing Factors of Cultivated Land NPP in Major Grain Producing Areas (Henan Province)].[主要粮食产区(河南省)耕地净初级生产力的时空分异特征及影响因素]
Huan Jing Ke Xue. 2025 Jun 8;46(6):3632-3644. doi: 10.13227/j.hjkx.202406053.
7
Characterization of spatial and temporal correlation between ecosystem service and human activity intensity in Xinjiang, China based on supply and demand.基于供需的中国新疆生态系统服务与人类活动强度的时空相关性特征分析
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2025 Aug;36(8):2455-2464. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202508.024.
8
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
9
Identification and analysis of driving factors for ecosystem service bundles in Shanxi Province under multiple scenario simulations.多情景模拟下山西省生态系统服务束驱动因素识别与分析
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 1;15(1):20789. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-08876-5.
10
Optimizing zonal management framework suitable for mountain ecosystems by linking landscape, ecosystem service capacities and bundles nested.通过将景观、生态系统服务能力和嵌套的服务束联系起来,优化适用于山地生态系统的区域管理框架。
J Environ Manage. 2025 Aug;389:125998. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.125998. Epub 2025 Jun 5.