de Sain Anouk M, Ruis Carla, Zomers Margot L, Ten Hoor-Suykerbuyk Marjon E G, Kuunders Theo, de Vos Filip Y F L, Janssens Astrid, Seute Tatjana
Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Brain Center Rudolf Magnus, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Department of Experimental Psychology, Helmholtz Institute, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
PLoS One. 2025 Sep 9;20(9):e0330384. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0330384. eCollection 2025.
Attention to existential needs has become part of daily treatment. Studies have described the concepts of existential experiences and existential interventions. However, a consensus or conceptual clarity regarding an existential approach in cancer patients is currently missing. This scoping review investigates the term existential approach and suggests a definition.
We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and PsycINFO databases until March 2024. We used the Joanna Briggs Institute guidance, and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews to conduct the review in a systematic manner. The review was conducted in collaboration with patient colleagues who were diagnosed with cancer. Two categories were included: 1) articles investigating elements that are present in existential approaches according to patients and 2) articles investigating elements that are not yet present in existential approaches but recommended by patients.
2791 articles were identified for title and abstract screening, of which 90 were screened for full text. Seventeen articles were eligible for inclusion. Elements were identified that led to the following definition of an existential approach: 'Medical practice based on a holistic and interdisciplinary view wherein the personal alliance provides room for mutual sharing of thoughts, acknowledging existential issues besides medical issues, whilst paying attention to personal values and what matters most'.
This definition provides a framework and therefore makes an existential approach more applicable. Different healthcare providers (e.g., nurses/physicians) can be part of an existential approach. To provide an existential approach in daily treatment, future studies should focus on training in communication skills.
关注生存需求已成为日常治疗的一部分。研究描述了生存体验和生存干预的概念。然而,目前在癌症患者的生存方法方面缺乏共识或概念上的清晰性。本范围综述调查了生存方法这一术语并提出了一个定义。
我们检索了截至2024年3月的PubMed、Embase、Web of Science和PsycINFO数据库。我们使用乔安娜·布里格斯研究所的指南以及系统评价和Meta分析扩展版的首选报告项目(PRISMA-ScR)以系统的方式进行综述。该综述是与被诊断患有癌症的患者同事合作进行的。纳入了两类文章:1)调查患者认为生存方法中存在的要素的文章,以及2)调查生存方法中尚未存在但患者推荐的要素的文章。
共筛选出2791篇文章的标题和摘要,其中90篇进行了全文筛选。17篇文章符合纳入标准。确定了一些要素,从而得出了生存方法的如下定义:“基于整体和跨学科观点的医疗实践,其中个人联盟为思想的相互分享提供空间,除了医疗问题外还承认生存问题,同时关注个人价值观和最重要的事情”。
这个定义提供了一个框架,因此使生存方法更具适用性。不同的医疗服务提供者(如护士/医生)可以参与生存方法。为了在日常治疗中提供生存方法,未来的研究应侧重于沟通技巧的培训。