• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

抖音和哔哩哔哩上经动脉化疗栓塞术视频的质量与可靠性:横断面内容分析研究

Quality and Reliability of Transarterial Chemoembolization Videos on TikTok and Bilibili: Cross-Sectional Content Analysis Study.

作者信息

Niu Yushuo, Song Guilan, Niu Zheyu, Xiao Sijian, Li Cuicui, Han Na, Wan Hao, Hou Xiaohong

机构信息

Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, 9677 Jingshi Road, Lixia District, Jinan, 250000, China, +86-13290333867.

Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, China.

出版信息

JMIR Form Res. 2025 Sep 17;9:e73855. doi: 10.2196/73855.

DOI:10.2196/73855
PMID:40961365
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12443354/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is a widely used treatment for advanced, unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma, often requiring multiple sessions for optimal efficacy. TikTok and Bilibili have gained widespread popularity as easily accessible sources of health information.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to assess the quality of the information in Chinese short videos on TACE shared on TikTok and Bilibili.

METHODS

In November 2024, the top 100 TACE-related Chinese-language short videos on TikTok and Bilibili (a total of 200 videos) were assessed and reviewed. Initially, basic information about the videos was recorded and analyzed. Subsequently, Global Quality Score and the DISCERN tool were used to evaluate the information quality and reliability of the videos on both platforms. Finally, multifactorial analysis was used to identify potential factors influencing the quality of the videos.

RESULTS

TikTok is more popular than Bilibili, despite its videos being shorter in length (P<.001). The quality of short videos on TACE found on both platforms was of low quality, with average Global Quality Score scores of 2.31 (SD 0.81) on TikTok and 2.48 (SD 0.80) on Bilibili, as well as DISCERN scores of 1.86 (SD 0.40) on TikTok and 2.00 (SD 0.44) on Bilibili. The number of saves (β=.184, P=.008; β=.176, P=.01) and days (β=.214, P=.002; β=.168, P=.01) since publication were identified as closely related variables to video quality and reliability. Furthermore, the duration of the video was closely related to its reliability (β=.213, P=.002).

CONCLUSIONS

This study indicates that the quality of TACE-related health information in the top 100 short videos on both Bilibili and TikTok platforms is suboptimal. Patients should exercise caution when relying on health-related information from these platforms. Social media companies should establish review teams with basic medical knowledge. It is essential for the platforms to enhance their recommendation algorithms and implement measures for video quality assessment. Health care professionals should be aware of the limitations of these videos and work to improve their quality.

摘要

背景

经动脉化疗栓塞术(TACE)是一种广泛应用于晚期不可切除肝细胞癌的治疗方法,通常需要多次治疗才能达到最佳疗效。抖音和哔哩哔哩作为易于获取健康信息的来源,已广受欢迎。

目的

本研究旨在评估在抖音和哔哩哔哩上分享的关于TACE的中文短视频中的信息质量。

方法

2024年11月,对抖音和哔哩哔哩上排名前100的与TACE相关的中文短视频(共200个视频)进行评估和审查。首先,记录并分析视频的基本信息。随后,使用全球质量评分和DISCERN工具评估两个平台上视频的信息质量和可靠性。最后,采用多因素分析来确定影响视频质量的潜在因素。

结果

抖音比哔哩哔哩更受欢迎,尽管其视频长度较短(P<0.001)。在两个平台上发现的关于TACE的短视频质量较低,抖音上的全球质量评分平均得分为2.31(标准差0.81),哔哩哔哩上为2.48(标准差0.80),抖音上的DISCERN评分为1.86(标准差0.40),哔哩哔哩上为2.00(标准差0.44)。自发布以来的保存次数(β=0.184,P=0.008;β=0.176,P=0.01)和天数(β=0.214,P=0.002;β=0.168,P=0.01)被确定为与视频质量和可靠性密切相关的变量。此外,视频时长与其可靠性密切相关(β=0.213,P=0.002)。

结论

本研究表明,哔哩哔哩和抖音平台上排名前100的短视频中与TACE相关的健康信息质量欠佳。患者在依赖这些平台的健康相关信息时应谨慎。社交媒体公司应组建具备基本医学知识的审核团队。平台增强其推荐算法并实施视频质量评估措施至关重要。医疗保健专业人员应意识到这些视频的局限性并努力提高其质量。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b226/12443354/4968a23caef6/formative-v9-e73855-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b226/12443354/b9891c203ece/formative-v9-e73855-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b226/12443354/ae65483a13fd/formative-v9-e73855-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b226/12443354/4968a23caef6/formative-v9-e73855-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b226/12443354/b9891c203ece/formative-v9-e73855-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b226/12443354/ae65483a13fd/formative-v9-e73855-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b226/12443354/4968a23caef6/formative-v9-e73855-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Quality and Reliability of Transarterial Chemoembolization Videos on TikTok and Bilibili: Cross-Sectional Content Analysis Study.抖音和哔哩哔哩上经动脉化疗栓塞术视频的质量与可靠性:横断面内容分析研究
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Sep 17;9:e73855. doi: 10.2196/73855.
2
Quality and Dissemination of Uterine Fibroid Health Information on TikTok and Bilibili: Cross-Sectional Study.抖音和哔哩哔哩上子宫肌瘤健康信息的质量与传播:横断面研究
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Aug 1;9:e75120. doi: 10.2196/75120.
3
Web-Based Video Platforms as Sources of Information on Body Image Dissatisfaction in Adolescents: Content and Quality Analysis of a Cross-Sectional Study.基于网络的视频平台作为青少年身体意象不满信息来源的横断面研究:内容与质量分析
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Sep 2;9:e71652. doi: 10.2196/71652.
4
Information quality of videos related to esophageal cancer on tiktok, kwai, and bilibili: a cross-sectional study.抖音、快手和哔哩哔哩上与食管癌相关视频的信息质量:一项横断面研究。
BMC Public Health. 2025 Jul 2;25(1):2245. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-23475-9.
5
The quality and reliability of short videos about premature ovarian failure on Bilibili and TikTok: Cross-sectional study.哔哩哔哩和抖音上关于卵巢早衰短视频的质量与可靠性:横断面研究
Digit Health. 2025 Jun 17;11:20552076251351077. doi: 10.1177/20552076251351077. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
6
Assessing the Video Content Quality of TikTok and Bilibili as Health Information Sources for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Cross-Sectional Study.评估抖音和哔哩哔哩作为系统性红斑狼疮健康信息来源的视频内容质量:一项横断面研究。
Int J Rheum Dis. 2025 Jun;28(6):e70341. doi: 10.1111/1756-185X.70341.
7
Quality and Reliability of Adolescent Sexuality Education on Chinese Video Platforms: Sentiment-Topic Analysis and Cross-Sectional Study.中国视频平台上青少年性教育的质量与可靠性:情感主题分析与横断面研究
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Sep 5;9:e77100. doi: 10.2196/77100.
8
Short video platforms as sources of health information about HPV vaccine: A content and quality analysis.作为HPV疫苗健康信息来源的短视频平台:内容与质量分析
Digit Health. 2025 Sep 15;11:20552076251379340. doi: 10.1177/20552076251379340. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
9
Quality and reliability of prostate cancer-Videos on TikTok and Bilibili: Cross-sectional content analysis study.TikTok和哔哩哔哩上前列腺癌相关视频的质量与可靠性:横断面内容分析研究
Digit Health. 2025 Sep 3;11:20552076251376263. doi: 10.1177/20552076251376263. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
10
Quality assessment of spinal cord injury-related health information on short-form video platforms: Cross-sectional content analysis of TikTok, Kwai, and BiliBili.短视频平台上脊髓损伤相关健康信息的质量评估:对TikTok、快手和哔哩哔哩的横断面内容分析
Digit Health. 2025 Sep 2;11:20552076251374226. doi: 10.1177/20552076251374226. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.

本文引用的文献

1
Videos in Short-Video Sharing Platforms as Sources of Information on Colorectal Polyps: Cross-Sectional Content Analysis Study.短视频分享平台上的视频作为结直肠息肉信息来源:横断面内容分析研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Oct 29;26:e51655. doi: 10.2196/51655.
2
Common data quality elements for health information systems: a systematic review.健康信息系统通用数据质量要素:系统评价。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2024 Sep 2;24(1):243. doi: 10.1186/s12911-024-02644-7.
3
Cancer misinformation on social media.社交媒体上的癌症错误信息。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2024 Sep-Oct;74(5):453-464. doi: 10.3322/caac.21857. Epub 2024 Jun 19.
4
YouTube/ Bilibili/ TikTok videos as sources of medical information on laryngeal carcinoma: cross-sectional content analysis study.YouTube/ Bilibili/ TikTok 视频作为喉癌医学信息来源:横断面内容分析研究。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Jun 14;24(1):1594. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19077-6.
5
Social media use and its impact on adults' mental health and well-being: A scoping review.社交媒体的使用及其对成年人心理健康和幸福感的影响:范围综述。
Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2024 Aug;21(4):345-394. doi: 10.1111/wvn.12727. Epub 2024 May 12.
6
The status quo of short videos as a health information source of : a cross-sectional study.短视频作为健康信息来源的现状:一项横断面研究。
Front Public Health. 2024 Jan 8;11:1344212. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1344212. eCollection 2023.
7
TikTok video as a health education source of information on heart failure in China: a content analysis.TikTok 视频作为中国心力衰竭健康教育信息来源:内容分析。
Front Public Health. 2023 Dec 11;11:1315393. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1315393. eCollection 2023.
8
Efficacy of Transarterial Chemoembolization (TACE) for Early-Stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma.经动脉化疗栓塞术(TACE)治疗早期肝细胞癌的疗效。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Dec 14;59(12):2174. doi: 10.3390/medicina59122174.
9
The quality of information provided by the most popular dementia videos on TikTok.TikTok 上最受欢迎的痴呆症视频提供的信息质量。
Front Public Health. 2023 Nov 28;11:1266415. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1266415. eCollection 2023.
10
The quality and reliability of TikTok videos on non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: a propensity score matching analysis.非酒精性脂肪性肝病 TikTok 视频的质量和可靠性:倾向评分匹配分析。
Front Public Health. 2023 Oct 4;11:1231240. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1231240. eCollection 2023.