Benz Sarah Leona, Kuhlmann Julia, Bilik Jonas, Liepert Manfred, Schreckenberg Dirk
ZEUS GmbH, Centre for Applied Psychology, Environmental and Social Research, 58093 Hagen, Germany.
Möhler + Partner Ingenieure GmbH, 86153 Augsburg, Germany.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025 Aug 30;22(9):1366. doi: 10.3390/ijerph22091366.
Environmental noise exposure is omnipresent, but the type of noise source and its appraisal may differ in varying contexts. For instance, studies have found significant differences in annoyance ratings between urbanisation levels. In this article, a re-analysis of existing survey data is presented, assessing noise annoyance and sleep disturbance from road traffic and railway noise in a random sample stratified by rural, suburban, and inner-city areas. Noise exposure was estimated using modelled and levels. Exposure-response curves showed greater annoyance at lower road traffic noise levels compared to the WHO guidelines (10% highly annoyed at 35 dB vs. WHO 53 dB ). Railway noise annoyance aligned with the WHO estimates; however, sleep disturbance was lower at comparable exposure levels (3% highly sleep-disturbed at 53 dB vs. WHO 44 dB). This re-analysis provides robust exposure-response relationships. The findings indicate higher levels for road traffic noise annoyance in Germany compared to international standards. A resulting policy implication is to link regular population surveys to noise action planning as a form of public participation. This approach enables the development of measures tailored to local conditions and supports the estimation of potential impacts, such as the number of people who may benefit from reduced noise exposure.
环境噪声暴露无处不在,但噪声源的类型及其评估在不同环境中可能有所不同。例如,研究发现城市化水平之间的烦恼评级存在显著差异。在本文中,对现有调查数据进行了重新分析,评估了农村、郊区和市中心地区随机抽样中道路交通和铁路噪声引起的噪声烦恼和睡眠干扰。使用建模水平估计噪声暴露。暴露-反应曲线显示,与世界卫生组织指南相比,道路交通噪声水平较低时烦恼程度更高(在35分贝时10%的人高度烦恼,而世界卫生组织为53分贝)。铁路噪声烦恼与世界卫生组织的估计一致;然而,在可比的暴露水平下,睡眠干扰较低(在53分贝时3%的人高度睡眠受扰,而世界卫生组织为44分贝)。这种重新分析提供了可靠的暴露-反应关系。研究结果表明,德国道路交通噪声烦恼水平高于国际标准。由此产生的政策含义是将定期的人口调查与噪声行动计划联系起来,作为公众参与的一种形式。这种方法能够制定适合当地情况的措施,并支持对潜在影响的估计,例如可能从减少噪声暴露中受益的人数。