Farmer S G, Komorowski R A
Appl Microbiol. 1972 Mar;23(3):500-4. doi: 10.1128/am.23.3.500-504.1972.
This paper describes the comparison of the Sterifil lysis-filtration (SLF) blood culture procedure with a standard Trypticase soy broth (TSB) technique. The lysing solutions employed in the SLF system, Triton X-100 (alkyl phenoxy polyethoxy ethanol) and sodium carbonate, were deleterious to most bacteria commonly encountered in bacteremia except staphylococci and enterococci. Candida was not adversely affected. There was a positive correlation between the tolerance of the microbial isolants to the lysing solutions and their recovery by the SLF technique. A total of 3,554 cultures were run in parallel and 398 isolants were obtained. Of 201 gram-positive isolants, 135 were recovered by both techniques, 43 were detected by the TSB technique only, and 23 were recovered only with the SLF method. In sharp contrast, of 168 gram-negative isolants, 28 were recovered in common, 130 were isolated only by TSB, and 10 were recovered only with the SLF method. The SLF method detected all cases of candidemia detected by the TSB method plus an additional 12 for a total of 29 cases. The SLF method, as currently described, is generally too toxic to bacteria for routine use in a clinical laboratory.
本文描述了Sterifil裂解过滤(SLF)血培养程序与标准胰蛋白酶大豆肉汤(TSB)技术的比较。SLF系统中使用的裂解液,即吐温X-100(烷基苯氧基聚乙氧基乙醇)和碳酸钠,对菌血症中常见的大多数细菌(除葡萄球菌和肠球菌外)都有害。念珠菌未受到不利影响。微生物分离株对裂解液的耐受性与其通过SLF技术的回收率之间存在正相关。总共同时进行了3554次培养,获得了398株分离株。在201株革兰氏阳性分离株中,两种技术均回收了135株,仅TSB技术检测到43株,仅SLF方法回收了23株。形成鲜明对比的是,在168株革兰氏阴性分离株中,共有28株被回收,仅TSB分离出130株,仅SLF方法回收了10株。SLF方法检测出了TSB方法检测到的所有念珠菌血症病例,另外还多检测出12例,共计29例。如目前所描述的,SLF方法对细菌的毒性通常过大,无法在临床实验室常规使用。