Mosley W H, Aziz K M, Rahman A S, Chowdhury A K, Ahmed A
Bull World Health Organ. 1973;49(4):381-7.
A controlled cholera vaccine field trial was carried out to test the efficacy of monovalent whole-cell Inaba and Ogawa cholera vaccines and a purified Inaba antigen. This study was designed particularly to study the level of protection produced by these vaccines against homologous and heterologous serotypes and to correlate the results with mouse protection tests and human serological response to the vaccines. A cohort of 45 000 children, aged 0-14 years, was divided into a control group and three vaccine groups. Inoculations were given annually for 2 years just before the start of the cholera season, and follow-up was continued for one additional year. Essentially, all cholera cases were due to the Inaba serotype, so that protection could be studied only against that serotype. Two annual injections of the whole-cell Inaba vaccine gave the highest level of protection, averaging 84% over the 3 years of follow-up; a single injection of the purified Inaba vaccine gave less protection (51%). Two annual injections of the whole-cell Ogawa vaccine failed to protect children under the age of 5 but did produce 48% protection for children aged 5-14 against Inaba cholera. Serological surveys correlated poorly with protection; specifically, the Ogawa vaccine produced high anti-Inaba titres in young children but no protection. The cross-protection against Inaba cholera produced by Ogawa vaccine in the older children is assumed to be due to boosting of naturally acquired immunity in this population. Monovalent vaccine cannot be recommended for general public health use because of the serotype specificity of protection that this study has demonstrated.
进行了一项对照霍乱疫苗现场试验,以测试单价全细胞稻叶型和小川型霍乱疫苗以及纯化的稻叶型抗原的效力。本研究特别旨在研究这些疫苗针对同源和异源血清型产生的保护水平,并将结果与小鼠保护试验以及人体对疫苗的血清学反应相关联。一组45000名0至14岁的儿童被分为一个对照组和三个疫苗组。在霍乱季节开始前每年接种一次,持续2年,并继续随访1年。基本上,所有霍乱病例均由稻叶型血清型引起,因此只能研究针对该血清型的保护作用。每年注射两次全细胞稻叶型疫苗提供了最高水平的保护,在3年的随访中平均为84%;单次注射纯化的稻叶型疫苗提供的保护较少(51%)。每年注射两次全细胞小川型疫苗未能保护5岁以下儿童,但对5至14岁儿童预防稻叶型霍乱的保护率为48%。血清学调查与保护作用的相关性较差;具体而言,小川型疫苗在幼儿中产生了高抗稻叶型抗体滴度,但没有提供保护。假定小川型疫苗在较大儿童中对稻叶型霍乱产生的交叉保护作用是由于该人群中自然获得的免疫力增强。由于本研究已证明的保护作用的血清型特异性,不建议将单价疫苗用于一般公共卫生用途。