Waitz J A, Moss E L, Drube C G, Weinstein M J
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1972 Dec;2(6):431-7. doi: 10.1128/AAC.2.6.431.
Gentamicin, sisomicin, tobramycin, and kanamycin were compared in parallel tests in vitro and in vivo against a variety of bacterial strains and species. A number of differences were seen in vitro, in particular: (i) the lower activity of kanamycin, (ii) the greater activity of tobramycin against Pseudomonas, (iii) the greater activity of gentamicin and sisomicin against Serratia, and (iv) the generally similar results with tobramycin, gentamicin, and sisomicin against species other than Pseudomonas and Serratia, with the ranking in order of decreasing activity being sisomicin, gentamicin, and tobramycin. Analysis of disc test results suggested that the gentamicin disc is not adequate for testing the susceptibility of all bacteria to sisomicin or tobramycin. In vivo tests did not confirm all specifics of in vitro tests; results of in vivo tests indicated that sisomicin may be the most active. It is suggested that the place of each of the antibiotics in human therapy can best be evaluated by more rigorous in vivo tests and clinical studies rather than extensive in vitro comparisons.
在体外和体内的平行试验中,对庆大霉素、西索米星、妥布霉素和卡那霉素针对多种细菌菌株和菌种进行了比较。在体外观察到了一些差异,特别是:(i)卡那霉素活性较低;(ii)妥布霉素对假单胞菌的活性较高;(iii)庆大霉素和西索米星对沙雷氏菌的活性较高;(iv)对于除假单胞菌和沙雷氏菌以外的菌种,妥布霉素、庆大霉素和西索米星的结果总体相似,活性从高到低依次为西索米星、庆大霉素和妥布霉素。纸片试验结果分析表明,庆大霉素纸片不足以检测所有细菌对西索米星或妥布霉素的敏感性。体内试验并未证实体外试验的所有细节;体内试验结果表明,西索米星可能活性最高。建议通过更严格的体内试验和临床研究,而非广泛的体外比较,来最佳地评估每种抗生素在人类治疗中的地位。