McDade J J, Sabel F L, Akers R L, Walker R J
Appl Microbiol. 1968 Jul;16(7):1086-92. doi: 10.1128/am.16.7.1086-1092.1968.
Engineering and microbiological tests indicated that a typical, commercial laminar airflow cabinet was not effective in providing either product protection or agent containment. The cabinet was modified and tested through a series of alternate configurations to establish a set of design criteria. A mock-up cabinet was developed from these design criteria. The mock-up unit was evaluated for efficiency in providing both product protection and agent containment. In these evaluations, challenge methods were developed to simulate normal, in-use laboratory operations. Controlled bacterial or viral aerosol challenges were used at higher than normal levels to provide stringent test conditions. Test results indicated that the mock-up unit was considerably better in preventing agent penetration (0.1 to 0.2 particles per 100 ft(3) of air) than the commercial cabinet (5 to 6 particles per 100 ft(3) of air) during product protection tests. Similarly, agent containment was considerably better in the new cabinet (particle escape of 2 to 3 per 100 ft(3) of air at only one of the five test sites) than in the commercial cabinet (particle escape of 2 to 14 per 100 ft(3) of air at three of the five test sites).
工程学和微生物学测试表明,典型的商用层流通风柜在提供产品保护或病原体隔离方面均无效。对该通风柜进行了改造,并通过一系列不同的配置进行测试,以确立一套设计标准。根据这些设计标准制作了一个样机通风柜。对该样机装置在提供产品保护和病原体隔离方面的效率进行了评估。在这些评估中,开发了一些挑战方法来模拟正常的实验室实际操作。使用高于正常水平的受控细菌或病毒气溶胶挑战来提供严格的测试条件。测试结果表明,在产品保护测试期间,样机装置在防止病原体穿透方面(每100立方英尺空气中0.1至0.2个颗粒)比商用通风柜(每100立方英尺空气中5至6个颗粒)要好得多。同样,新通风柜在病原体隔离方面(在五个测试地点中只有一个地点每100立方英尺空气中有2至3个颗粒逸出)比商用通风柜(在五个测试地点中的三个地点每100立方英尺空气中有2至14个颗粒逸出)要好得多。