• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在接受霍乱疫苗接种的人群中霍乱发病率:合作组与非合作组的比较。

Cholera incidence in a population offered cholera vaccination: comparison of cooperative and uncooperative groups.

作者信息

Azurin J C, Alvero M

出版信息

Bull World Health Organ. 1971;44(6):815-9.

PMID:4950563
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2427867/
Abstract

From May 1964 to December 1965, a controlled field trial of the effectiveness of cholera and cholera El Tor vaccines was conducted in Negros Occidental, Philippines. Some people did not volunteer for vaccination, and of those who did some received cholera vaccine and others a control (typhoid) vaccine. After analysing he incidence of cholera among these three groups it was found that the morbidity and mortality rates were significantly higher in the unvaccinated group than in either the control vaccine group or the cholera vaccine group. This would indicate that the unvaccinated group is basically different from the vaccinated control group. The clinical course of the disease was the same whether the patient had been vaccinated or not. The reasons for non-vaccination were investigated and should be taken into account by public health agencies when immunization programmes are being planned.

摘要

1964年5月至1965年12月,在菲律宾西内格罗斯省进行了一项关于霍乱疫苗和霍乱埃尔托型疫苗有效性的对照现场试验。一些人没有自愿接种疫苗,在自愿接种的人群中,有些人接种了霍乱疫苗,其他人接种了对照(伤寒)疫苗。分析这三组人群中的霍乱发病率后发现,未接种疫苗组的发病率和死亡率显著高于对照疫苗组或霍乱疫苗组。这表明未接种疫苗组与接种疫苗的对照组存在本质差异。无论患者是否接种过疫苗,疾病的临床病程都是相同的。对未接种疫苗的原因进行了调查,公共卫生机构在规划免疫计划时应予以考虑。

相似文献

1
Cholera incidence in a population offered cholera vaccination: comparison of cooperative and uncooperative groups.在接受霍乱疫苗接种的人群中霍乱发病率:合作组与非合作组的比较。
Bull World Health Organ. 1971;44(6):815-9.
2
A controlled field trial of the effectiveness of monovalent classical and El Tor cholera vaccines in the Philippines.在菲律宾进行的单价传统霍乱疫苗和埃尔托霍乱疫苗有效性的对照现场试验。
Bull World Health Organ. 1973;49(1):13-9.
3
A controlled field trial of the effectiveness of various doses of cholera El Tor vaccine in the Philippines.菲律宾不同剂量霍乱埃尔托型疫苗有效性的对照现场试验。
Bull World Health Organ. 1968;38(6):917-23.
4
A controlled field trial of the effectiveness of cholera and cholera El Tor vaccines in the Philippines. Preliminary report; Philippines Cholera Committee.菲律宾霍乱及埃尔托型霍乱疫苗有效性的对照现场试验。初步报告;菲律宾霍乱委员会
Bull World Health Organ. 1965;32(5):603-25.
5
A controlled field trial of the effectiveness of cholera and cholera El Tor vaccines in the Philippines.菲律宾霍乱及埃尔托霍乱疫苗有效性的对照现场试验。
Bull World Health Organ. 1967;37(5):703-27.
6
Controlled field trial of the effectiveness of cholera and cholera El Tor vaccines in Calcutta.霍乱及埃尔托型霍乱疫苗在加尔各答有效性的对照现场试验。
Bull World Health Organ. 1967;37(3):371-85.
7
A controlled field trial on the effectiveness of the intradermal and subcutaneous administration of cholera vaccine in the Philippines.菲律宾霍乱疫苗皮内和皮下接种效果的对照现场试验。
Bull World Health Organ. 1973;49(4):389-94.
8
Cost-effectiveness of oral cholera vaccine in a stable refugee population at risk for epidemic cholera and in a population with endemic cholera.口服霍乱疫苗在面临霍乱流行风险的稳定难民群体以及霍乱地方性流行群体中的成本效益。
Bull World Health Organ. 1998;76(4):343-52.
9
A controlled field trial of plain and aluminium hydroxide-adsorbed cholera vaccines in Surabaya, Indonesia, during 1973--75.1973年至1975年期间,在印度尼西亚泗水进行的霍乱疫苗(普通型和氢氧化铝吸附型)对照现场试验。
Bull World Health Organ. 1978;56(4):619-27.
10
Studies of cholera El Tor in the Philippines. I. Characteristics of cholera El Tor in Negros Occidental Province, November 1961 to September 1962.菲律宾霍乱埃尔托型研究。一、1961年11月至1962年9月西内格罗斯省霍乱埃尔托型的特征。
Bull World Health Organ. 1965;33(5):627-36.

引用本文的文献

1
Oral vaccines for preventing cholera.用于预防霍乱的口服疫苗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Mar 16;2011(3):CD008603. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008603.pub2.
2
Vaccines for preventing cholera: killed whole cell or other subunit vaccines (injected).用于预防霍乱的疫苗:灭活全细胞疫苗或其他亚单位疫苗(注射用)。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Aug 4;2010(8):CD000974. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000974.pub2.
3
Outcomes of patients who participate in randomized controlled trials compared to similar patients receiving similar interventions who do not participate.参与随机对照试验的患者与接受类似干预但未参与试验的类似患者的结局比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jul 16;2008(3):MR000009. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000009.pub4.

本文引用的文献

1
A controlled field trial of the effectiveness of cholera and cholera El Tor vaccines in the Philippines.菲律宾霍乱及埃尔托霍乱疫苗有效性的对照现场试验。
Bull World Health Organ. 1967;37(5):703-27.