• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

百日咳控制中免疫接种及其他因素的流行病学评估

Epidemiological evaluation of immunisation and other factors in the control of whooping-cough.

作者信息

Bassili W R, Stewart G T

出版信息

Lancet. 1976 Feb 28;1(7957):471-4. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(76)91488-4.

DOI:10.1016/s0140-6736(76)91488-4
PMID:55731
Abstract

The general incidence of whooping-cough is lower in fully immunised children, but present immunisation schedules do not adequately protect the infant below 1 year of age either from contracting infection or from its complications. In a recent outbreak in Glasgow, nearly one-third of notified cases were fully immunised. In Glasgow and probably in the U.K. as a whole, the persistance of whooping-cough in some areas is more strongly correlated with adverse socio-economic conditions that with lack of immunisation. The decline in recent years could be attributable to improvement in these conditions at least as much as to immunisation. There is no epidemiological justification for continuing mass immunisation, but there is a strong case for an intensified eradication policy which might include selective immunisation in high-risk groups and areas.

摘要

百日咳在完全免疫的儿童中的总体发病率较低,但目前的免疫接种计划并不能充分保护1岁以下的婴儿免受感染或其并发症的影响。在格拉斯哥最近的一次疫情中,近三分之一的报告病例是完全免疫的。在格拉斯哥,可能在整个英国,百日咳在某些地区的持续存在与不利的社会经济状况的相关性比与缺乏免疫接种的相关性更强。近年来发病率的下降至少可以归因于这些状况的改善,就像归因于免疫接种一样。继续进行大规模免疫接种没有流行病学依据,但有充分理由加强根除政策,这可能包括在高危人群和地区进行选择性免疫接种。

相似文献

1
Epidemiological evaluation of immunisation and other factors in the control of whooping-cough.百日咳控制中免疫接种及其他因素的流行病学评估
Lancet. 1976 Feb 28;1(7957):471-4. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(76)91488-4.
2
Whooping cough and pertussis vaccine: a comparison of risks and benefits in Britain during the period 1968-83.百日咳与百日咳疫苗:1968 - 1983年英国的风险与益处比较
Dev Biol Stand. 1985;61:395-405.
3
Whooping-cough admissions to a paediatric hospital over ten years. The protective value of immunisation.十年间一家儿科医院百日咳的住院情况。免疫接种的保护作用。
Lancet. 1977 Jan 29;1(8005):237-9. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(77)91029-7.
4
Evidence of whooping-cough-vaccine efficacy from the 1978 whooping-cough epidemic in Hertfordshire.1978年赫特福德郡百日咳疫情中百日咳疫苗效力的证据。
Lancet. 1979 Jul 28;2(8135):188-90. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(79)91447-8.
5
Whooping cough after stopping pertussis immunisation.停止百日咳免疫接种后发生的百日咳
Br Med J. 1979 Jun 16;1(6178):1601-3. doi: 10.1136/bmj.1.6178.1601.
6
Attack rates of notified whooping cough in immunised and unimmunised children.免疫儿童和未免疫儿童中百日咳报告发病率
Br Med J. 1976 Jan 17;1(6002):128-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.1.6002.128.
7
Vaccination against whooping-cough. Efficacy versus risks.
Lancet. 1977 Jan 29;1(8005):234-7. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(77)91028-5.
8
Whooping-cough vaccination. Comment on report from Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation.百日咳疫苗接种。对疫苗接种与免疫联合委员会报告的评论
Lancet. 1978 Feb 18;1(8060):370-1. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(78)91092-9.
9
Maternal pertussis immunisation: clinical gains and epidemiological legacy.孕产妇百日咳免疫接种:临床获益与流行病学影响
Euro Surveill. 2017 Apr 13;22(15). doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2017.22.15.30510.
10
Duration of effectiveness of pertussis vaccine: evidence from a 10 year community study.百日咳疫苗的有效性持续时间:一项为期10年的社区研究证据
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1988 Feb 27;296(6622):612-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.296.6622.612.

引用本文的文献

1
Immune persistence after pertussis vaccination.百日咳疫苗接种后的免疫持久性。
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2017 Apr 3;13(4):744-756. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2016.1259780. Epub 2017 Jan 3.
2
Molecular pathogenesis, epidemiology, and clinical manifestations of respiratory infections due to Bordetella pertussis and other Bordetella subspecies.百日咳博德特氏菌及其他博德特氏菌亚种引起的呼吸道感染的分子发病机制、流行病学及临床表现
Clin Microbiol Rev. 2005 Apr;18(2):326-82. doi: 10.1128/CMR.18.2.326-382.2005.
3
Which strategy for pertussis vaccination today?
如今百日咳疫苗接种采用哪种策略?
Paediatr Drugs. 2002;4(5):299-313. doi: 10.2165/00128072-200204050-00003.
4
Pertussis in infants diagnosed by an ambulatory unit: an illness that still persists.由门诊单位诊断的婴儿百日咳:一种仍然存在的疾病。
J Natl Med Assoc. 1980 Aug;72(8):779-80.
5
Whooping cough in relation to other childhood infections in 1977-9 in the United Kingdom.1977 - 1979年英国百日咳与其他儿童期感染的关系
J Epidemiol Community Health. 1981 Jun;35(2):139-45. doi: 10.1136/jech.35.2.139.
6
Whooping cough--a study of severity in hospital cases.百日咳——住院病例严重程度的研究
Arch Dis Child. 1981 Sep;56(9):687-91. doi: 10.1136/adc.56.9.687.
7
Distribution of immunity to pertussis in the population of England and Wales.英格兰和威尔士人群中百日咳免疫力的分布情况。
J Hyg (Lond). 1984 Feb;92(1):21-36. doi: 10.1017/s0022172400063993.
8
The severity of whooping cough in hospitalised children--is it declining?住院儿童百日咳的严重程度——是否在下降?
J Hyg (Lond). 1985 Apr;94(2):151-61. doi: 10.1017/s0022172400061350.
9
The past, present, and future of pertussis. The role of adults in epidemiology and future control.百日咳的过去、现在与未来。成人在流行病学及未来防控中的作用。
West J Med. 1989 Mar;150(3):319-28.
10
Letter: Immunisation against whooping cough.信件:百日咳免疫接种
Br Med J. 1976 Mar 27;1(6012):770-1. doi: 10.1136/bmj.1.6012.770-b.