Jasin H E, Lennard D, Ziff M
Clin Exp Immunol. 1971 May;8(5):801-14.
The immunosuppressive and anti-inflammatory properties of rabbit antirat macrophage (AMG) and rabbit antirat thymocyte globulin (ALG) have been compared. experiments showed that both AMG and ALG contained antibodies directed against rat thymocytes and macrophages. When AMG was absorbed with large numbers of thymocytes, the final product was found to lack agglutinating and cytotoxic antibodies against such cells. However, AMG was cytotoxic to rat peritoneal macrophages at a dilution of 1/512 while the ALG cytotoxic titre was 1/64. It was also shown that AMG was able to suppress phagocytosis by peritoneal mononuclear cells while ALG was ineffective. The immunosuppressive activity of AMG and ALG when given at the time of induction of the immune response was studied . Rats were pretreated with the antisera prior to induction of Freund's adjuvant arthritis and immunization with sheep erythrocytes. Administration of ALG prior to induction of adjuvant arthritis resulted in complete inhibition of the disease while AMG treated rats developed arthritis. ALG treated rats produced almost no haemagglutinating antibody to sheep erythrocytes used as antigen while the AMG treated group developed titres not significantly different from the control group. When the same animals were rechallenged with sheep erythrocytes 5 weeks later the response of the AMG treated group was similar to that of controls, while the ALG treated animals developed a primary antibody response. When the antisera were given to animals coinciding with the development of generalized arthritis in order to study their anti-inflammatory activity, AMG treated rats showed a small decrease in the severity of arthritis. ALG was much more effective in reducing the inflammatory signs of the disease and its suppressive effects lasted for 2 weeks after the last injection. The anti-inflammatory properties of ALG were also evident in the marked inhibition of the granuloma in the adjuvant-injected paw which paralleled the effects of treatment on the polyarthritis. Similarly, ALG treatment produced a severe depression of the delayed hypersensitivity response to tuberculin while AMG was ineffective. The above results indicate that ALG is a strong anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive agent while AMG has no immunosuppressive properties and is only a mild anti-inflammatory agent.
已对兔抗大鼠巨噬细胞球蛋白(AMG)和兔抗大鼠胸腺细胞球蛋白(ALG)的免疫抑制和抗炎特性进行了比较。实验表明,AMG和ALG均含有针对大鼠胸腺细胞和巨噬细胞的抗体。当用大量胸腺细胞吸收AMG时,发现最终产物缺乏针对此类细胞的凝集和细胞毒性抗体。然而,AMG在稀释至1/512时对大鼠腹腔巨噬细胞具有细胞毒性,而ALG的细胞毒性效价为1/64。还表明,AMG能够抑制腹腔单核细胞的吞噬作用,而ALG则无效。研究了在免疫反应诱导时给予AMG和ALG的免疫抑制活性。在诱导弗氏佐剂性关节炎和用绵羊红细胞免疫之前,先用抗血清对大鼠进行预处理。在诱导佐剂性关节炎之前给予ALG可导致疾病完全抑制,而用AMG治疗的大鼠则发生关节炎。用ALG治疗的大鼠几乎不产生针对用作抗原的绵羊红细胞的血凝抗体,而用AMG治疗的组产生的效价与对照组无显著差异。当5周后用绵羊红细胞再次攻击相同的动物时,用AMG治疗的组的反应与对照组相似,而用ALG治疗的动物产生了初次抗体反应。为了研究它们的抗炎活性,当将抗血清给予与全身性关节炎发展同时期的动物时,用AMG治疗的大鼠的关节炎严重程度略有降低。ALG在减轻疾病的炎症体征方面更有效,并且其抑制作用在最后一次注射后持续2周。ALG的抗炎特性在佐剂注射爪中肉芽肿的明显抑制中也很明显,这与对多关节炎的治疗效果相似。同样,ALG治疗使对结核菌素的迟发型超敏反应严重降低,而AMG则无效。上述结果表明,ALG是一种强效的抗炎和免疫抑制剂,而AMG没有免疫抑制特性,只是一种轻度的抗炎剂。