Boltz-Nitulescu G, Foerster O
Immunology. 1979 Nov;38(3):621-30.
Antisera produced in rabbits against adherent cells of rat alveolar or peritoneal lavage fluid (anti-rat alveolar macrophage sera, ARAMS, or anti-rat peritoneal macrophage sera, ARPMS) were used to detect antigenic differences between alveolar (AM) and peritoneal (PM) macrophages in an indirect membrane immunofluorescence (IMF) test. Of all sera tested, the IMF titres were higher with cells of that population which was used for immunization. These differences were found before and after exhaustive absorptions with insolubilized rat plasma, rat erythrocytes, and non-adherent rat kidney, spleen, thymus and bone marrow cells. The differences were not due to antigens specific for one of the macrophage populations, as demonstrated by cross-adsorption studies with macrophages of different localization. It is assumed that two or more macrophage specific antigenic determinants are present in different density in the two macrophage populations.
用兔制备的抗大鼠肺泡或腹腔灌洗液贴壁细胞的抗血清(抗大鼠肺泡巨噬细胞血清,ARAMS,或抗大鼠腹腔巨噬细胞血清,ARPMS),在间接膜免疫荧光(IMF)试验中检测肺泡巨噬细胞(AM)和腹腔巨噬细胞(PM)之间的抗原差异。在所有测试血清中,用用于免疫的细胞群体的细胞进行检测时,IMF滴度更高。在用不溶性大鼠血浆、大鼠红细胞以及非贴壁大鼠肾、脾、胸腺和骨髓细胞进行彻底吸收前后均发现了这些差异。交叉吸附研究表明,这些差异并非由于某一种巨噬细胞群体特有的抗原所致,不同定位的巨噬细胞均可出现这种差异。推测在两种巨噬细胞群体中,两种或更多种巨噬细胞特异性抗原决定簇以不同密度存在。