Suppr超能文献

连续识别中的检索过程。

Retrieval processes in continuous recognition.

作者信息

Hockley W E

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1982 Nov;8(6):497-512. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.8.6.497.

Abstract

The accuracy and response latency of yes/no recognition decisions were measured in three experiments by the continuous recognition paradigm. The principal independent variable was lag, or the number of intervening items between target presentations. Lag was varied from 0 to 40. A logarithmic function provided a good description of the relation between lag and correct response latency. Item repetition affected the intercept of the logarithmic functions, with little effect on the slope. A noun/nonnoun stimulus manipulation affected the slope of the functions with no appreciable effect on the intercept. The latter result was obtained both for once-repeated and twice-repeated item functions, and both when the stimulus manipulation was a between-lists variable (Experiment 2) and a within-lists variable (Experiment 3). The results were found to be incompatible with Atkinson and Juola's (1973) model and Murdock's (1974) conveyor-belt model. The retrieval theory of Ratcliff (1978) and the multiple-observations model of Pike, Dalgleish, and Wright (1977) provide the most satisfactory account of the present results. However, both models may have difficulty in accounting for the obtained repetition effects.

摘要

在三个实验中,采用连续识别范式测量了“是/否”识别决策的准确性和反应潜伏期。主要自变量是间隔,即目标呈现之间的干扰项数量。间隔从0变化到40。对数函数很好地描述了间隔与正确反应潜伏期之间的关系。项目重复影响对数函数的截距,对斜率影响很小。名词/非名词刺激操作影响函数的斜率,对截距没有明显影响。无论是一次重复还是两次重复的项目函数,以及当刺激操作是列表间变量(实验2)和列表内变量(实验3)时,都得到了后一个结果。研究结果被发现与阿特金森和乔拉(1973)的模型以及默多克(1974)的传送带模型不相符。拉特克利夫(1978)的检索理论和派克、达格利什和赖特(1977)的多观察模型对目前的结果提供了最令人满意的解释。然而,这两个模型在解释所获得的重复效应时可能都有困难。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验