Suppr超能文献

对百日咳博德特氏菌血清型4、5和6因子的重新评估。

A reappraisal of serotype factors 4, 5 and 6 of Bordetella pertussis.

作者信息

Preston N W, Surapatana N, Carter E J

出版信息

J Hyg (Lond). 1982 Feb;88(1):39-46. doi: 10.1017/s0022172400069874.

Abstract

Twelve strains of Bordetella pertussis, of various serotypes, were tested by agglutination with serial dilutions of six antisera which were thought by their donor to be monospecific for six distinct agglutinogens. The first three sera were shown, by agglutination of the twelve donated strains and of standard pertussis serotypes, to be monospecific for the three well-recognized major agglutinogens (factor 1, factor 2, factor 3). The 'factor 4' serum gave weak agglutination, but only of strains that possessed factor 2, though not all of such strains. This suggested that it may be a distinct minor component of factor 2. The 'factor 5' serum was very weak, and gave agglutination only with a few of the factor 2 strains. The titres of the 'factor 6' serum were very closely parallel to those of the factor 3 serum, and it may be inferred that these 'factors' probably constitute a single antigenic entity. Seven of the twelve donated strains were shown to be mixtures of two or more serotypes, offering an explanation for discrepancies in serological tests involving the use of these strains on different occasions. It seems likely that 'factors 5 and 6' do not actually exist; and, since 'factor 4' is only a minor component of factor 2, any protective role that it may have would probably be covered by the presence of factor 2 in vaccine.

摘要

用六种抗血清的系列稀释液对十二株不同血清型的百日咳博德特氏菌进行凝集试验,这些抗血清的提供者认为它们对六种不同的凝集原具有单特异性。通过对十二株捐赠菌株和标准百日咳血清型的凝集试验表明,前三种抗血清对三种公认的主要凝集原(因子1、因子2、因子3)具有单特异性。“因子4”抗血清产生微弱凝集,但仅对具有因子2的菌株有凝集作用,不过并非所有此类菌株。这表明它可能是因子2的一个独特的次要成分。“因子5”抗血清非常微弱,仅对少数因子2菌株产生凝集作用。“因子6”抗血清的效价与因子3抗血清的效价非常接近,可以推断这些“因子”可能构成一个单一的抗原实体。十二株捐赠菌株中有七株被证明是两种或更多血清型的混合物,这就解释了在不同场合使用这些菌株进行血清学检测时出现差异的原因。似乎“因子5和6”实际上并不存在;而且,由于“因子4”只是因子2的一个次要成分,它可能具有的任何保护作用很可能会被疫苗中因子2的存在所涵盖。

相似文献

4
Serotyping Bordetella pertussis strains.
Vaccine. 1989 Dec;7(6):491-4. doi: 10.1016/0264-410x(89)90270-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Pertussis: the disease and new diagnostic methods.百日咳:疾病与新诊断方法
Clin Microbiol Rev. 1988 Oct;1(4):365-76. doi: 10.1128/CMR.1.4.365.
7
Assessing the response to pertussis vaccine.评估对百日咳疫苗的反应。
BMJ. 1991 Nov 9;303(6811):1204. doi: 10.1136/bmj.303.6811.1204-b.

本文引用的文献

9
Some unsolved problems with vaccines.疫苗存在的一些未解决问题。
Prog Drug Res. 1979;23:9-26. doi: 10.1007/978-3-0348-7105-1_1.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验