Wilkinson H W
Yale J Biol Med. 1984 Jul-Aug;57(4):567-72.
Standardized serologic tests for Lyme disease are needed, as isolation or in situ demonstration of the spirochete has proved difficult. At the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), an indirect immunofluorescence assay (IFA) was modified from a previously described IFA, and an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was developed with soluble spirochetal antigens. Both tests were evaluated with sera from Lyme disease patients, normal controls, and patients with other diseases. They were highly specific for Lyme disease when sera from patients with syphilis were excluded. Sensitivity varied with disease stage: for patients with erythema chronicum migrans alone, the IFA was 53 percent sensitive and the ELISA was 67 percent sensitive. In contrast, all patients with complicated Lyme disease had at least one serum specimen positive in both tests. Twenty-six percent of the sera from 289 patients with suspected Lyme disease that were submitted to CDC in 1983 had IFA titers greater than or equal to 256 and thus were considered positive. Both tests should be useful diagnostic and epidemiologic aids.
由于已证明很难分离或原位显示疏螺旋体,因此需要标准化的莱姆病血清学检测方法。在美国疾病控制中心(CDC),一种间接免疫荧光测定法(IFA)是在先前描述的IFA基础上改进而来的,同时还开发了一种使用可溶性螺旋体抗原的酶联免疫吸附测定法(ELISA)。这两种检测方法都用莱姆病患者、正常对照者以及患有其他疾病患者的血清进行了评估。当排除梅毒患者的血清时,它们对莱姆病具有高度特异性。敏感性因疾病阶段而异:仅患有慢性游走性红斑的患者,IFA的敏感性为53%,ELISA的敏感性为67%。相比之下,所有患有复杂性莱姆病的患者在两种检测中至少有一份血清标本呈阳性。1983年提交给CDC的289例疑似莱姆病患者的血清中,26%的IFA滴度大于或等于256,因此被视为阳性。这两种检测方法都应是有用的诊断和流行病学辅助手段。