Griffiths R R, McLeod D R, Bigelow G E, Liebson I A, Roache J D
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1984;84(2):147-54. doi: 10.1007/BF00427437.
The effects of diazepam (10-160 mg) and oxazepam (30-480 mg) were studied in volunteers with histories of drug abuse. Oral doses were administered every third day under double-blind and counterbalanced conditions. Dose-effects with area under the time-action curve data (AUC) showed diazepam to be 2.6-5.7-times more potent than oxazepam on various psychomotor, cognitive, staff-rated, and subjective measures. Comparison of relative potencies showed diazepam to be relatively more potent in producing 'liking' than in producing psychomotor and cognitive effects. Diazepam produced greater peak effects than oxazepam on a number of staff- and subject-rated measures, including liking. Onset of effect was more rapid and time to maximal effect was shorter (1-2 h versus 4-12 h) with diazepam than oxazepam, while time to offset of effect was similar for the two drugs. Diazepam was categorized as producing barbiturate-like subjective effects (38.3%) more frequently than was oxazepam (13.8%), while oxazepam was identified as placebo more often than diazepam. Repeated administration of 160 mg diazepam and 480 mg oxazepam showed that AUC liking was greater for diazepam than oxazepam and that tolerance to psychomotor and cognitive effects occurred with oxazepam but not diazepam. This study suggests that diazepam may have a higher abuse liability than oxazepam.
在有药物滥用史的志愿者中研究了地西泮(10 - 160毫克)和奥沙西泮(30 - 480毫克)的效果。在双盲和平衡条件下,每三天口服给药一次。根据时间 - 作用曲线下面积数据(AUC)得出的剂量效应表明,在地西泮的各种精神运动、认知、工作人员评分和主观测量指标上,其效力比奥沙西泮高2.6至5.7倍。相对效力的比较表明,地西泮在产生“喜好”方面比在产生精神运动和认知效应方面相对更有效力。在包括喜好在内的一些工作人员和受试者评分指标上,地西泮产生的峰值效应比奥沙西泮更大。地西泮的起效更快,达到最大效应的时间更短(1 - 2小时对比4 - 12小时),而两种药物的作用消退时间相似。地西泮产生巴比妥类主观效应的频率(38.3%)高于奥沙西泮(13.8%),而奥沙西泮被识别为安慰剂的频率高于地西泮。重复给予160毫克地西泮和480毫克奥沙西泮表明,地西泮的AUC喜好大于奥沙西泮,并且奥沙西泮会产生对精神运动和认知效应的耐受性,而地西泮不会。这项研究表明,地西泮可能比奥沙西泮具有更高的滥用可能性。