Suppr超能文献

通过直接接种和早期读取纸片扩散试验对血培养分离株进行快速抗菌药敏试验。

Rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing of isolates from blood cultures by direct inoculation and early reading of disk diffusion tests.

作者信息

Coyle M B, McGonagle L A, Plorde J J, Clausen C R, Schoenknecht F D

出版信息

J Clin Microbiol. 1984 Sep;20(3):473-7. doi: 10.1128/jcm.20.3.473-477.1984.

Abstract

Disk diffusion tests, inoculated directly from positive blood cultures, were evaluated for accuracy of reading zone diameters after 4- and 6-h and overnight incubation. In comparisons with results from standard disk diffusion tests, the 4-h results were in agreement for 83% of tests with gram-positive organisms and 64% of tests with gram-negative organisms. When minor discrepancies were ignored, the 4-h readings were in agreement for 98% of the tests with gram-positive organisms and 95% of the tests with gram-negative organisms. After 6 h of incubation, 91% of the tests with gram-positive organisms and 86% of the tests with gram-negative organisms agreed with standard results. The agreement was 99% for tests with both gram-positive and gram-negative organisms when minor discrepancies were excluded. Very major discrepancies occurred in two tests (0.1%) with gram-positive organisms and were not observed in tests with gram-negative organisms. The frequencies of major discrepancies were 3.5% after 4 h, 0.6% after 6 h, and 0.7% after overnight incubation. Ampicillin and cephalothin tests with Escherichia coli and Klebsiella spp. accounted for 81% of the major discrepancies in tests with gram-negative organisms. Oxacillin tests accounted for more than half of the major discrepancies in tests with staphylococci. The results of this study, which did not include the newer antibiotics, indicate that direct susceptibility tests from blood cultures read after 6 h of incubation are more reliable than 4-h results and produce less than 1% major errors in comparisons with standard susceptibility tests.

摘要

对接种自阳性血培养物的纸片扩散试验,评估了在4小时、6小时及过夜培养后读取抑菌圈直径的准确性。与标准纸片扩散试验结果相比,对于革兰氏阳性菌,4小时结果在83%的试验中一致;对于革兰氏阴性菌,4小时结果在64%的试验中一致。若忽略微小差异,对于革兰氏阳性菌,4小时读数在98%的试验中一致;对于革兰氏阴性菌,4小时读数在95%的试验中一致。培养6小时后,对于革兰氏阳性菌,91%的试验与标准结果一致;对于革兰氏阴性菌,86%的试验与标准结果一致。排除微小差异后,革兰氏阳性菌和革兰氏阴性菌的试验一致性均为99%。在革兰氏阳性菌的两项试验(0.1%)中出现了非常大的差异,而在革兰氏阴性菌的试验中未观察到。主要差异的发生率在4小时后为3.5%,6小时后为0.6%,过夜培养后为0.7%。大肠杆菌和克雷伯菌属的氨苄西林和头孢噻吩试验占革兰氏阴性菌试验中主要差异的81%。苯唑西林试验占葡萄球菌试验中主要差异的一半以上。本研究结果(未包括新型抗生素)表明,血培养直接药敏试验在培养6小时后读取比4小时结果更可靠,与标准药敏试验相比产生的主要误差小于1%。

相似文献

7
Standardization of direct susceptibility test for blood cultures.血培养直接药敏试验的标准化
J Clin Microbiol. 1979 Mar;9(3):347-50. doi: 10.1128/jcm.9.3.347-350.1979.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验