Suppr超能文献

预测强化透析治疗尿毒症性心包炎的疗效。

Predicting success of intensive dialysis in the treatment of uremic pericarditis.

作者信息

De Pace N L, Nestico P F, Schwartz A B, Mintz G S, Schwartz J S, Kotler M N, Swartz C

出版信息

Am J Med. 1984 Jan;76(1):38-46. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(84)90742-3.

Abstract

To identify predictors of the success or failure of daily intensive dialysis in uremic pericarditis, a retrospective examination was made of initial clinical, laboratory, and echocardiographic data in 97 patients using univariate and multivariate statistical analysis. In this group, 67 patients showed response to intensive dialysis, and 30 patients did not (22 required surgery and eight died). By univariate analysis, nine factors correlated with intensive dialysis failure (p less than 0.10): admission temperature over 102 degrees F, rales, admission blood pressure under 100 mm Hg, jugular venous distension, peritoneal dialysis treatment only because of severe hemodynamic instability, white blood cell count over 15,000/mm3, white blood cell count left shift, large effusion by echocardiography, and both anterior and posterior effusion by echocardiography. Echocardiographic left ventricular size and function were not useful predictors of success or failure; there was no difference in response to hemodialysis in patients with pericarditis before dialysis (69 percent) versus patients with pericarditis during a maintenance program (67 percent). By discriminant analysis, a seven-variable function was constructed that divided the patients into three groups: (1) those likely to show response to intensive dialysis (48 patients, predictive value of 98 percent), (2) those with an intermediate (38 percent) chance of showing response to intensive dialysis (30 patients), and (3) those unlikely to show response to intensive dialysis (14 patients, predictive value of 100 percent). When the function was applied prospectively to 12 patients (eight with success and four with failure), all were classified correctly. Thus, discriminant analysis of patients with uremic pericarditis allows improved selection of patients with uremic pericarditis likely to have response to daily intensive dialysis and early consideration of alternative forms of treatment in patients unlikely to show response to intensive dialysis. However, the model should be validated in the particular institution where it is to be used before its application.

摘要

为了确定尿毒症心包炎患者每日强化透析成功或失败的预测因素,我们采用单因素和多因素统计分析方法,对97例患者的初始临床、实验室及超声心动图数据进行了回顾性研究。该组患者中,67例对强化透析有反应,30例无反应(22例需要手术,8例死亡)。单因素分析显示,9个因素与强化透析失败相关(p<0.10):入院体温超过102华氏度、啰音、入院血压低于100 mmHg、颈静脉扩张、仅因严重血流动力学不稳定而进行腹膜透析治疗、白细胞计数超过15,000/mm³、白细胞计数左移、超声心动图显示大量积液以及超声心动图显示前后均有积液。超声心动图测量的左心室大小和功能并非成功或失败的有效预测指标;透析前患有心包炎的患者(69%)与维持性治疗期间患有心包炎的患者(67%)对血液透析的反应无差异。通过判别分析,构建了一个七变量函数,将患者分为三组:(1)可能对强化透析有反应的患者(48例,预测价值为98%),(2)对强化透析有中等反应机会(38%)的患者(30例),(3)不太可能对强化透析有反应的患者(14例,预测价值为100%)。当将该函数前瞻性应用于12例患者(8例成功,4例失败)时,所有患者均被正确分类。因此,对尿毒症心包炎患者进行判别分析有助于更好地选择可能对每日强化透析有反应的尿毒症心包炎患者,并对不太可能对强化透析有反应的患者尽早考虑其他治疗方式。然而,在应用该模型之前,应在其使用的特定机构进行验证。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验