Barry A L, Gavan T L, Badal R E, Telenson M J
J Clin Microbiol. 1982 Apr;15(4):582-8. doi: 10.1128/jcm.15.4.582-588.1982.
Two independent laboratories tested 1,743 clinical isolates by using the Enterobacteriaceae-plus Biochemical Card in the AutoMicrobic system (AMS) and identical standard reference methods. Included were 55 isolates representing 11 species that cannot be identified by the enterobacteriaceae-plus Biochemical Card computer program; 3 or these isolates were incorrectly identified as Pseudomonas cepacia. With the other 1,688 isolates, 5% of the AMS identifications were considered to be equivocal (probability value, less than 0.80), and the remaining test were 97% accurate (sensitive), Difficulty was observed in the ability of the AMS to identify some H2S-negative Citrobacter freundii species. An AMS response of P. cepacia was also considered nonspecific, because several other organisms were misidentified at P. cepacia. Reproducibility of the system was documented by testing 125 strains on 3-separate days; only 6 strains produced significantly variable results. The AMS (with the Enterobacteriaceae-plus Biochemical Card) was a very satisfactory, automated system for accurately identifying most gram-negative bacilli within 8 to 13 h.
两个独立实验室使用自动微生物系统(AMS)中的肠杆菌科加生化卡以及相同的标准参考方法,对1743株临床分离株进行了检测。其中包括55株代表11个物种的分离株,这些物种无法通过肠杆菌科加生化卡计算机程序进行鉴定;其中3株被错误鉴定为洋葱伯克霍尔德菌。对于其他1688株分离株,AMS鉴定结果中有5%被认为是不明确的(概率值小于0.80),其余检测的准确率为97%(敏感)。观察到AMS在鉴定一些硫化氢阴性弗氏柠檬酸杆菌物种时存在困难。AMS对洋葱伯克霍尔德菌的反应也被认为是非特异性的,因为其他几种微生物被误鉴定为洋葱伯克霍尔德菌。通过在3个不同日期对125株菌株进行检测,证明了该系统的可重复性;只有6株产生了显著不同的结果。AMS(配备肠杆菌科加生化卡)是一个非常令人满意的自动化系统,能够在8至13小时内准确鉴定大多数革兰氏阴性杆菌。