Nachamkin I, Lynch J R, Dalton H P
J Clin Microbiol. 1982 Sep;16(3):521-4. doi: 10.1128/jcm.16.3.521-524.1982.
A new 4-h commercial system (API 20S; Analytab Products, Plainview, N.Y.) for the identification of streptococci was compared with the conventional biochemical profile method in the species identification of alpha-hemolytic streptococci. A total of 194 clinical isolates (including 74 isolated from blood cultures, 64 isolated from wound cultures, and 56 isolated from respiratory cultures) and 20 reference strains were tested. Only 4 of the 20 reference strains were correctly identified to species level by the API 20S system. Six were identified to group level (viridans), four were incorrectly identified, and six did not conform to the identification key. Of the 194 clinical isolates tested, 79 (39%) were correctly identified to species level, 34 (17.5%) were identified to group level, 34 (17.5%) were incorrectly identified, and 50 (25.8%) did not conform to the identification key. Of the 12 different species of alpha-hemolytic streptococci isolated from clinical specimens, the API 20S system consistently identified Streptococcus faecalis and Streptococcus faecium, but consistently misidentified the other 10 species, especially Streptococcus mitis. Our results indicate that for identification to species level, the API 20S system is of little value for alpha-hemolytic streptococci other than enterococci.
一种用于鉴定链球菌的新型4小时商业系统(API 20S;Analytab Products公司,纽约州普莱恩维尤)与传统生化特征方法在α-溶血性链球菌的菌种鉴定方面进行了比较。共测试了194株临床分离株(包括74株从血培养中分离得到的、64株从伤口培养中分离得到的以及56株从呼吸道培养中分离得到的)和20株参考菌株。API 20S系统仅将20株参考菌株中的4株正确鉴定到种水平。6株被鉴定到群水平(草绿色链球菌),4株被错误鉴定,6株不符合鉴定标准。在测试的194株临床分离株中,79株(39%)被正确鉴定到种水平,34株(17.5%)被鉴定到群水平,34株(17.5%)被错误鉴定,50株(25.8%)不符合鉴定标准。从临床标本中分离出的12种不同的α-溶血性链球菌中,API 20S系统始终能鉴定出粪肠球菌和屎肠球菌,但始终错误鉴定其他10种,尤其是缓症链球菌。我们的结果表明,对于种水平的鉴定,API 20S系统除了对肠球菌外,对其他α-溶血性链球菌的价值不大。