McCune J M, Lingappa V R, Fu S M, Blobel G, Kunkel H G
J Exp Med. 1980 Aug 1;152(2):463-8. doi: 10.1084/jem.152.2.463.
Structural differences between the heavy chain of membrane-bound IgM (mu m) and the heavy chain of secreted IgM (mu s) were investigated. The primary translation products of the mu-chain, free of posttranslational modifications, were synthesized in a wheat-germ cell-free system, programmed with messenger RNA derived from human lymphoblastoid cell lines positive for both membrane-bound and secreted IgM. Encoded in this sytem were two mu-chains, which shared N-terminal signal peptides and which differed both in molecular weight and in C-terminal amino acid sequence. In vivo pulse labeling of cells confirmed that, as intermediates in the rough endoplasmic reticulum, these two forms expressed the same idiotype and maintained their difference in molecular weight and in C-terminal sequence. By correlation with pulse-chase kinetics and with immunofluorescence, one form of mu-chain represents mu m, and the other, mu s. Because the molecular weight difference between the two is manifest at the level of their primary translation products, these studies demonstrate that mu m is distinguished from mu s by a difference in primary structure, at least in part at the C-terminus.
对膜结合型IgM(μm)重链与分泌型IgM(μs)重链之间的结构差异进行了研究。μ链的初级翻译产物未经翻译后修饰,在小麦胚芽无细胞体系中合成,该体系由源自对膜结合型和分泌型IgM均呈阳性的人淋巴母细胞系的信使核糖核酸编程。该体系编码了两条μ链,它们共享N端信号肽,分子量和C端氨基酸序列均不同。细胞的体内脉冲标记证实,作为粗面内质网中的中间体,这两种形式表达相同的独特型,并在分子量和C端序列上保持差异。通过与脉冲追踪动力学和免疫荧光的相关性分析,一种μ链形式代表μm,另一种代表μs。由于两者之间的分子量差异在其初级翻译产物水平上就已显现,这些研究表明,μm与μs的区别在于一级结构的差异,至少部分在于C端。