Otto L A, Blachman U
J Clin Microbiol. 1979 Aug;10(2):147-54. doi: 10.1128/jcm.10.2.147-154.1979.
Three systems for the identification of nonfermentative bacilli were evaluated for their rapidity and accuracy of identification of 217 strains. Two of the systems, API 20E (API) and Oxi/Ferm tube (OxiF), are available as kits; the oxidative attack (OA) system is not commerically available. The overall accuracies of the OA, API, and OxiF systems were 91, 69, and 50%, respectively. Identification within 48 h was achieved for 98% of the strains by OA, for 50% by API, and for 18% by OxiF. Most of the organisms that were either misidentified or not identified by API and OxiF were those nonfermentative bacilli which are relatively more fastidious or rarely encountered or both. All three systems accurately identified nonfermentative bacilli commonly isolated at Olive View Medical Center, namely, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Acinetobacter anitratus, Pseudomonas maltophilia, Acinetobacter lwoffi, saccharolytic flavobacteria (CDC IIb), moraxellae, Pseudomonas fluorescens, and Pseudomonas putida. The OA system identified 100% of the above organisms correctly, API identified 99.4%, and OxiF identified 99.3%. Since these organisms comprise 92% of the total number of nonfermentative bacilli isolated at Olive View Medical Center, we conclude that both API and OxiF may be useful alternatives to conventional methods, based on accuracy of identification alone. These two systems were considered substantially inferior to the OA system when both accuracy and rapidity of identification were taken into account.
对三种用于鉴定非发酵菌的系统进行了评估,以确定它们对217株菌株鉴定的速度和准确性。其中两种系统,API 20E(API)和氧化/发酵管(OxiF)有试剂盒可供使用;氧化攻击(OA)系统没有商业产品。OA、API和OxiF系统的总体准确率分别为91%、69%和50%。OA系统在48小时内对98%的菌株进行了鉴定,API为50%,OxiF为18%。API和OxiF误鉴定或未鉴定的大多数菌株是非发酵菌,它们相对更苛求或很少遇到或两者皆是。所有三种系统都准确鉴定了在橄榄景医疗中心常见分离的非发酵菌,即铜绿假单胞菌、无硝不动杆菌、嗜麦芽窄食单胞菌、洛菲不动杆菌、解糖黄杆菌(疾病控制中心IIb型)、莫拉菌、荧光假单胞菌和恶臭假单胞菌。OA系统正确鉴定了上述所有菌株的100%,API为99.4%,OxiF为99.3%。由于这些菌株占橄榄景医疗中心分离的非发酵菌总数的92%,仅基于鉴定准确性,我们得出结论,API和OxiF都可能是传统方法的有用替代方法。当同时考虑鉴定的准确性和速度时,这两种系统被认为明显不如OA系统。