Appelbaum P C, Leathers D J
J Clin Microbiol. 1984 Oct;20(4):730-4. doi: 10.1128/jcm.20.4.730-734.1984.
This study evaluated the ability of the Rapid NFT system (API System SA, Montalieu-Vercieu, France) to accurately identify 262 clinically isolated, gram-negative, nonfermentative rods without additional tests. Identifications were classified as correct; low discrimination, with a spectrum of two or more possibilities (additional tests necessary for accurate identification); and incorrect. Correct identification rates were analyzed in two categories: (i) correct to species or biotype for all organism groups except Alcaligenes faecalis-odorans, Moraxella, Pseudomonas testosteroni-alcaligenes-pseudoalcaligenes, and Acinetobacter calcoaceticus biotype haemolyticus-alcaligenes (in this category, the latter four genus-biotype group identifications were taken as correct) and (ii) correct to species or biotype in all cases, including the above four groups. In category i, 87.4% of the strains were correctly identified, with 4.2% low discrimination and 8.4% incorrect. When the criteria of category ii were used, 71.8% of the strains were correctly identified, with 19.9% low discrimination. The Rapid NFT system provided excellent species identification of Pseudomonas and Flavobacterium spp., Bordetella bronchiseptica, and Achromobacter xylosoxidans strains. Within Acinetobacter calcoaceticus, differentiation between biotypes anitratus and lwoffi was satisfactory, but the system did not differentiate between biotypes haemolyticus and alcaligenes. Species resolution within the genera Moraxella and Alcaligenes was incomplete. All Alcaligenes faecalis strains were misidentified and accounted for 50% of misidentifications with the Rapid NFT system; however, these results may reflect taxonomic differences rather than true misidentifications. The Rapid NFT system is easy to inoculate and interpret and represents a worthwhile advance in the identification of gram-negative, nonfermentative rods.
本研究评估了快速NFT系统(API System SA,法国蒙塔利厄 - 韦尔西厄)在不进行额外检测的情况下准确鉴定262株临床分离的革兰氏阴性非发酵菌的能力。鉴定结果分为正确;低鉴别力,即存在两种或更多可能性的范围(准确鉴定需要额外检测);以及错误。正确鉴定率按两类进行分析:(i)除嗜水气单胞菌 - 嗜嗅气单胞菌、莫拉菌属、睾丸酮假单胞菌 - 产碱菌 - 类产碱菌和溶血乙酸钙不动杆菌生物型 - 产碱菌外,所有菌组的鉴定正确至种或生物型(在此类别中,后四个属 - 生物型组的鉴定视为正确),以及(ii)在所有情况下,包括上述四组,鉴定正确至种或生物型。在类别i中,87.4%的菌株被正确鉴定,4.2%为低鉴别力,8.4%为错误鉴定。当使用类别ii的标准时,71.8%的菌株被正确鉴定,19.9%为低鉴别力。快速NFT系统对假单胞菌属和黄杆菌属、支气管败血波氏杆菌以及木糖氧化无色杆菌菌株提供了出色的种鉴定。在乙酸钙不动杆菌中,无硝生物型和鲁氏生物型之间的区分令人满意,但该系统无法区分溶血生物型和产碱生物型。莫拉菌属和产碱菌属内的种分辨率不完整。所有嗜水气单胞菌菌株均被错误鉴定,且占快速NFT系统错误鉴定的50%;然而,这些结果可能反映的是分类学差异而非真正的错误鉴定。快速NFT系统易于接种和解读,代表了革兰氏阴性非发酵菌鉴定方面的一项有价值的进展。