Nadler H, George H, Barr J
J Clin Microbiol. 1979 Feb;9(2):180-5. doi: 10.1128/jcm.9.2.180-185.1979.
The Oxi/Ferm (O/F) identification system was compared in a double-blind study to a conventional test battery for the characterization of 96 reference and clinical strains consisting of 83 nonfermentative and 13 oxidase-producing, fermentative gram-negative bacilli. The O/F tube and supplemental tests correctly identified 84% of the nonfermentative and 77% of the oxidase-producing, fermentative bacilli. However, when the supplemental tests were excluded and the biochemical profiles generated by all nine O/F tube reactions were examined, the profile accuracy reached 95% (79 of 83) for the nonfermentative and 93% (12 of 13) for oxidase-producing, fermentative bacilli. Seven of the nine O/F substrate reactions demonstrated less than or equal to 89% agreement with conventional reactions, whereas the urea and arginine reactions provided 82 and 85% agreement, respectively. Replicate O/F tests with six selected organisms demonstrated 97% identification reproducibility and 84% overall substrate reproducibility. The mean O/F identification time was 2.6 days as compared to 3.3 days for the conventional system. Although this study suggests that the O/F system is a convenient, rapid, and accurate alternative to conventional identification methods, several modifications are recommended.
在一项双盲研究中,将氧化/发酵(O/F)鉴定系统与传统检测组合进行了比较,以鉴定96株参考菌株和临床菌株,其中包括83株非发酵菌和13株产氧化酶的发酵革兰氏阴性杆菌。O/F管及补充试验正确鉴定了84%的非发酵菌和77%的产氧化酶的发酵杆菌。然而,当排除补充试验并检查所有九个O/F管反应产生的生化图谱时,非发酵菌的图谱准确率达到95%(83株中的79株),产氧化酶的发酵杆菌的图谱准确率达到93%(13株中的12株)。九个O/F底物反应中有七个与传统反应的一致性小于或等于89%,而尿素和精氨酸反应的一致性分别为82%和85%。对六种选定菌株进行的重复O/F试验显示,鉴定重现性为97%,总体底物重现性为84%。O/F鉴定的平均时间为2.6天,而传统系统为3.3天。虽然这项研究表明O/F系统是传统鉴定方法的一种方便、快速且准确的替代方法,但建议进行一些改进。