Bruner J M, Krenis L J, Kunsman J M, Sherman A P
Med Instrum. 1981 Jan-Feb;15(1):11-21.
Blood pressure measurements can be obtained in the clinical setting by a variety of methods, direct and indirect, but with varying results. Disparities between direct and indirect blood pressure measurements are due in part to physiological considerations, but are largely conditioned by the frequency of the recording system. In this, the first of three parts, the authors conclude that comparative studies of direct and indirect blood pressure fall into two groups, those resulting in close agreement between methods, and those that do not. Subsequent issues will include recommendations for further study (part II, March-April 1981), and will examine their own study of a group of patients undergoing surgery (part III, May-June 1981).
血压测量可以在临床环境中通过多种方法获得,包括直接测量法和间接测量法,但结果各不相同。直接测量法和间接测量法之间的差异部分归因于生理学因素,但很大程度上取决于记录系统的频率。在这三篇系列文章的第一篇中,作者得出结论,直接测量法和间接测量法的对比研究分为两类,一类是两种方法结果相近,另一类则不然。后续文章将包括进一步研究的建议(第二部分,1981年3月至4月),并将审视他们自己对一组接受手术患者的研究(第三部分,1981年5月至6月)。