Suppr超能文献

直接测量与间接测量动脉血压的比较。

Comparison of direct and indirect measuring arterial blood pressure.

作者信息

Bruner J M, Krenis L J, Kunsman J M, Sherman A P

出版信息

Med Instrum. 1981 Jan-Feb;15(1):11-21.

PMID:7015083
Abstract

Blood pressure measurements can be obtained in the clinical setting by a variety of methods, direct and indirect, but with varying results. Disparities between direct and indirect blood pressure measurements are due in part to physiological considerations, but are largely conditioned by the frequency of the recording system. In this, the first of three parts, the authors conclude that comparative studies of direct and indirect blood pressure fall into two groups, those resulting in close agreement between methods, and those that do not. Subsequent issues will include recommendations for further study (part II, March-April 1981), and will examine their own study of a group of patients undergoing surgery (part III, May-June 1981).

摘要

血压测量可以在临床环境中通过多种方法获得,包括直接测量法和间接测量法,但结果各不相同。直接测量法和间接测量法之间的差异部分归因于生理学因素,但很大程度上取决于记录系统的频率。在这三篇系列文章的第一篇中,作者得出结论,直接测量法和间接测量法的对比研究分为两类,一类是两种方法结果相近,另一类则不然。后续文章将包括进一步研究的建议(第二部分,1981年3月至4月),并将审视他们自己对一组接受手术患者的研究(第三部分,1981年5月至6月)。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验