Plorde J J, Gates J A, Carlson L G, Tenover F C
J Clin Microbiol. 1986 Feb;23(2):251-7. doi: 10.1128/jcm.23.2.251-257.1986.
During a 6-month study we critically evaluated the accuracy of the AutoMicrobic system Gram-Negative Identification Card (Vitek Systems, Inc., Hazelwood, Mo.) in identifying glucose-nonfermenting gram-negative bacilli by testing 419 selected isolates in parallel with a conventional reference method. Of 356 isolates included in the AutoMicrobic system profile, a total of 307 (86.2%) were correctly identified, 36 (10.1%) were not identified, and 13 (3.7%) were misidentified. Fifty-eight of 63 (92%) isolates not included in the profile were correctly reported as "unidentified organisms." Overall, if the first-choice identification was always accepted, only 18 (4.3%) isolates would have been incorrectly reported. When first-choice identifications appended with the special message "questionable biopattern" were rejected, and organisms were screened for characteristic odor and antimicrobial susceptibility before final acceptance of the AutoMicrobic system report, the number of misidentifications was reduced to 5 (1.2%). The average time to identification with the AutoMicrobic system Gram-Negative Identification Card was 15 h. This compares favorably with the 65 h required by the reference method.
在一项为期6个月的研究中,我们通过与传统参考方法平行检测419株选定的分离株,严格评估了自动微生物系统革兰氏阴性菌鉴定卡(Vitek系统公司,密苏里州黑兹尔伍德)在鉴定不发酵葡萄糖革兰氏阴性杆菌方面的准确性。在自动微生物系统分析中包含的356株分离株中,共有307株(86.2%)被正确鉴定,36株(10.1%)未被鉴定,13株(3.7%)被错误鉴定。在分析中未包含的63株分离株中有58株(92%)被正确报告为“未鉴定的微生物”。总体而言,如果总是接受首选鉴定结果,那么只有18株(4.3%)分离株会被错误报告。当拒绝附带有“可疑生物模式”特殊信息的首选鉴定结果,并在最终接受自动微生物系统报告之前对微生物进行特征气味和抗菌药敏性筛查时,错误鉴定的数量减少到5株(1.2%)。使用自动微生物系统革兰氏阴性菌鉴定卡进行鉴定的平均时间为15小时。这与参考方法所需的65小时相比具有优势。