自动视野计在跟踪青光眼视野进展中的有效性。

Effectiveness of automated perimetry in following glaucomatous visual field progression.

作者信息

Keltner J L, Johnson C A

出版信息

Ophthalmology. 1982 Mar;89(3):247-54. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(82)34800-9.

Abstract

The Fieldmaster automated perimeter's effectiveness in determining glaucomatous visual field progression was evaluated. One hundred fifty-four eyes with glaucoma (41) and ocular hypertension (113) were followed for two to four years with manual static and kinetic perimetry (Tübingen) and automated suprathreshold static perimetry (Fieldmaster). With Tübingen static testing, 11 eyes with established glaucomatous visual field loss demonstrated progressive field loss and one eye showed improvement. Ten of these 12 eyes showed progression on the Fieldmaster. Two ocular hypertensive eyes demonstrated consistent defects on the Fieldmaster over several years, but were not detected on Tübingen static perimetry. Comparison between Tübingen static testing and Fieldmaster perimetry was good except for four Fieldmaster false alarms.

摘要

评估了Fieldmaster自动视野计在确定青光眼性视野进展方面的有效性。对154只患有青光眼（41只）和高眼压症（113只）的眼睛进行了为期两到四年的随访，采用手动静态和动态视野检查法（图宾根）以及自动超阈值静态视野检查法（Fieldmaster）。通过图宾根静态测试，11只已确诊为青光眼性视野缺损的眼睛出现了视野进行性缺损，1只眼睛有所改善。这12只眼睛中有10只在Fieldmaster视野计检查中显示出进展。2只高眼压症眼睛在Fieldmaster视野计上显示出多年来一致的缺损，但在图宾根静态视野检查中未被检测到。除了4次Fieldmaster视野计误报外，图宾根静态测试和Fieldmaster视野计检查之间的比较结果良好。