Scott R C, Oliver G J, Dugard P H, Singh H J
Arch Dermatol Res. 1982;274(1-2):57-64. doi: 10.1007/BF00510358.
An Evaporimeter and a ventilated chamber technique have been compared in their ability to measure transepidermal water loss (TEWL) through rat skin. These techniques measure TEWL under very different conditions; the Evaporimeter measures the net TEWL under ambient relative humidity (RH) whereas the ventilated chamber employs a constant atmosphere, usually of low RH and thus measured the uni-directional diffusion of water. Paired Evaporimeter and ventilated chamber measurements were made of TEWL through normal skin and through skin whose barrier properties had been altered by tape-stripping (15 applications) or single applications of n-hexadecane (28.4 mumol cm-2). Both measuring techniques indicated the same level of TEWL through normal skin (mean 0.3 mg cm-2 h-1) and during increases in TEWL induced by n-hexadecane (max TEWL c 3.5 mg cm-2 h-1). However, the Evaporimeter was found to underestimate the higher rates of TEWL induced by tape-stripping, ie above TEWL raters of 7.5 mg cm-2 h-1. The Evaporimeter is portable, easy to use and suitable for measurements of net water loss up to 7.5 mg cm-2 h-1; it can only be used for comparative assessment of epidermal barrier function if used at a particular ambient RH. The more cumbersome ventilated chamber is to be preferred for accurate assessments of barrier function where high rates of TEWL occur.
对蒸发计和通风箱技术测量大鼠皮肤经皮水分流失(TEWL)的能力进行了比较。这些技术在非常不同的条件下测量TEWL;蒸发计在环境相对湿度(RH)下测量净TEWL,而通风箱采用恒定气氛,通常是低RH,因此测量水的单向扩散。通过正常皮肤以及屏障特性因胶带剥离(15次)或单次应用正十六烷(28.4 μmol/cm²)而改变的皮肤,进行了蒸发计和通风箱的配对测量。两种测量技术均表明,通过正常皮肤(平均0.3 mg/cm²·h⁻¹)以及在正十六烷诱导的TEWL增加期间(最大TEWL约3.5 mg/cm²·h⁻¹),TEWL水平相同。然而,发现蒸发计低估了胶带剥离诱导的较高TEWL速率,即高于7.5 mg/cm²·h⁻¹的TEWL速率。蒸发计便于携带、易于使用,适用于测量高达7.5 mg/cm²·h⁻¹的净水分流失;如果在特定环境RH下使用,它只能用于表皮屏障功能的比较评估。对于发生高TEWL速率时的屏障功能的准确评估,更笨重的通风箱更可取。