Matheson D M, Keighley M R
Gut. 1981 Feb;22(2):126-9. doi: 10.1136/gut.22.2.126.
Sixty-three patients with complete rectal prolapse and/or faecal incontinence have undergone anal manometry and the results have been compared with an equal number of age- and sex-matched controls. Maximal basal pressure (MBP) and maximum squeeze pressure (MSP) were measured before and at four months and a year after treatment. The anal pressures of normal subjects are presented. Patients with rectal prolapse alone had normal anal pressures, whereas patients with incontinence with or without prolapse had significantly lower basal and squeeze pressures than controls. Successful surgical treatment of prolapse or incontinence did not produce significant change in anal canal pressures, whereas the combination of pelvic floor exercises and a continence aid was associated with a significant rise in MSP.
63例完全性直肠脱垂和/或大便失禁患者接受了肛门测压,并将结果与同等数量年龄和性别匹配的对照组进行了比较。在治疗前、治疗后4个月和1年时测量最大基础压力(MBP)和最大收缩压力(MSP)。列出了正常受试者的肛门压力。单纯直肠脱垂患者的肛门压力正常,而有或无脱垂的失禁患者的基础压力和收缩压力明显低于对照组。成功的脱垂或失禁手术治疗并未使肛管压力产生显著变化,而盆底肌锻炼和控便辅助器具联合使用则与MSP显著升高相关。