Hölbling N, Funovics J, Euler J, Karner J, Zöch G, Sauermann G
Klin Wochenschr. 1981 Nov 2;59(21):1201-7. doi: 10.1007/BF01721215.
The possible role of poly(C)RNase serum activity and CEA serum level for early detection and differentiation of pancreatic carcinoma and its specificity and valuability were critically analyzed: Serum RNase (median, min-max) with polycytidin as substrate was determined in 13 "normal" patients (14.6 E/ml, 4.3--29.8 E/ml), 16 patients with pancreatic cancer (T3 or metastases) (17.6 E/ml, 6--49-9 E/ml), 15 patients with chronic pancreatitis (9.5 E/ml, 4.9--26.5 E/ml), 7 patients with acute pancreatitis (14.2 E/ml, 5.5--67.3 ng/ml), and 13 patients with other types of malignomas (15 E/ml, 4.3--42.5 E/ml). Serum CEA level was evaluated in 18 "normal" patients (1.15 ng/ml, 0--4.3 ng/ml), 12 patients with pancreatic carcinoma (T3 or metastases) (6.5 mg/ml, 2--456.5 ng/ml), 13 patients with chronic pancreatitis (2.3 ng/ml, 0--8.5 ng/ml), 8 patients with acute pancreatitis (2.7 ng/ml, 0.1--4.6 ng/ml) and 5 patients without operative verification of suspected pancreatic carcinoma (0.9 ng/ml, 0--1.7 ng/ml). The serum RNase activity in pancreatic cancer patients did not show any significant increase in comparison to the other groups, and these patients could not be distinguished from those with the other diseases when excluding other factors influencing serum RNase level such as: Renal insufficiency, nutrition, age, sex. Their CEA level was significantly higher in comparison to the other groups (p less than 0.05). Using 2.5 ng/ml as the limit, the sensitivity was found to be 80% (10/12 of pancreatic carcinomas positive) and the specificity being 70.5% (31/44 of other groups without malignant diseases negative). The presented study and data in the literature show that poly (C) RNase measurement is not useful in early detection of pancreatic carcinoma, but the CEA test could be helpful in the differential diagnosis of pancreatic diseases due to its specificity (70.5%) and seems to be valuable in detection of residual and in monitoring for recurrent pancreatic carcinoma in view of its sensitivity and correlation with the stage of cancer.
对聚(C)核糖核酸酶血清活性和癌胚抗原(CEA)血清水平在胰腺癌早期检测、鉴别诊断中的可能作用及其特异性和价值进行了批判性分析:测定了13例“正常”患者(14.6 E/ml,4.3 - 29.8 E/ml)、16例胰腺癌患者(T3期或有转移,17.6 E/ml,6 - 49.9 E/ml)、15例慢性胰腺炎患者(9.5 E/ml,4.9 - 26.5 E/ml)、7例急性胰腺炎患者(14.2 E/ml,5.5 - 67.3 ng/ml)和13例其他类型恶性肿瘤患者(15 E/ml,4.3 - 42.5 E/ml)以聚胞苷为底物的血清核糖核酸酶(中位数,最小值 - 最大值)。评估了18例“正常”患者(1.15 ng/ml,0 - 4.3 ng/ml)、12例胰腺癌患者(T3期或有转移,6.5 mg/ml,2 - 456.5 ng/ml)、13例慢性胰腺炎患者(2.3 ng/ml,0 - 8.5 ng/ml)、8例急性胰腺炎患者(2.7 ng/ml,0.1 - 4.6 ng/ml)和5例未经手术证实的疑似胰腺癌患者(0.9 ng/ml,0 - 1.7 ng/ml)的血清CEA水平。与其他组相比,胰腺癌患者的血清核糖核酸酶活性没有显著升高,在排除影响血清核糖核酸酶水平的其他因素(如肾功能不全、营养、年龄、性别)后,无法将这些患者与其他疾病患者区分开来。与其他组相比,他们的CEA水平显著更高(p < 0.05)。以2.5 ng/ml为临界值,敏感性为80%(12例胰腺癌中有10例阳性);特异性为70.5%(其他无恶性疾病的组中44例中有31例阴性)。本研究及文献中的数据表明,测定聚(C)核糖核酸酶对胰腺癌的早期检测无用,但CEA检测因其特异性(70.5%)在胰腺疾病的鉴别诊断中可能有帮助,并且鉴于其敏感性以及与癌症分期的相关性,在检测胰腺癌残留及监测复发方面似乎有价值。