Lessof M H, Wraith D G, Merrett T G, Merrett J, Buisseret P D
Q J Med. 1980;49(195):259-71.
One hundred patients who reacted adversely to one or more specific foods were studied. In 93 the food induced symptoms included asthma, eczema, angioedema, urticaria, rhinorrhoea, or a combination of one or more of these with gastrointestinal symptoms. The remaining seven had gastrointestinal symptoms only. The diagnosis of food allergy was made on the on the basis of a definite, immediate allergic reaction to specific foods or a reaction that was suggestive of allergy, supported by a corresponding positive skin prick or radioallergosorbent test. In the absence of such evidence, the less specific diagnosis of 'food intolerance' seemed preferable. Test materials appeared to differ in their diagnostic usefulness. A high proportion (c. 75 per cent) of patients who were intolerant to egg, fish or nuts had positive test results. In contrast, only 30 per cent of patients with milk intolerance had positive tests, suggesting inadequate test methods or a non-allergic cause for many patients' milk intolerance. Nevertheless, five milk intolerant patients with negative tests had milk-induced asthma.
对一种或多种特定食物有不良反应的100名患者接受了研究。在93名患者中,食物诱发的症状包括哮喘、湿疹、血管性水肿、荨麻疹、鼻漏,或这些症状中的一种或多种与胃肠道症状的组合。其余7名患者仅有胃肠道症状。食物过敏的诊断基于对特定食物明确的速发型过敏反应,或由相应的阳性皮肤点刺试验或放射变应原吸附试验支持的提示过敏的反应。在缺乏此类证据的情况下,“食物不耐受”这种特异性较低的诊断似乎更可取。测试材料在诊断效用上似乎有所不同。对鸡蛋、鱼类或坚果不耐受的患者中,很大一部分(约75%)检测结果呈阳性。相比之下,牛奶不耐受的患者中只有30%检测呈阳性,这表明检测方法不完善,或者许多患者的牛奶不耐受存在非过敏原因。然而,5名检测结果为阴性的牛奶不耐受患者出现了牛奶诱发的哮喘。