• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

集体回忆与决策过程中的专家角色分配和信息采样

Expert role assignment and information sampling during collective recall and decision making.

作者信息

Stewart D D, Stasser G

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Miami University, USA.

出版信息

J Pers Soc Psychol. 1995 Oct;69(4):619-28. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.69.4.619.

DOI:10.1037//0022-3514.69.4.619
PMID:7473023
Abstract

Previous research has found that decision-making groups do not effectively pool unshared information. This study examined how personal expertise facilitates the mentioning and validation of unshared information in collective recall and decision-making groups by increasing members' awareness of who holds what types of information. Assigned expertise increased substantially the proportion of unshared information mentioned during both collective recall and decision-making tasks. Two results supported the hypothesis that assigned expertise provides validation for the recall of unshared information. When expertise was assigned, (a) more of the unshared information mentioned during the recall task was retained on the collectively endorsed written protocol, and (b) unshared information that was mentioned in discussion was more likely to be correctly recognized by members after group interaction.

摘要

先前的研究发现,决策小组无法有效地汇集非共享信息。本研究考察了个人专业知识如何通过提高成员对谁掌握何种信息的认知,来促进集体回忆和决策小组中非共享信息的提及和验证。指定专业知识显著增加了集体回忆和决策任务中提及的非共享信息的比例。两项结果支持了以下假设:指定专业知识为非共享信息的回忆提供了验证。当指定了专业知识时,(a) 在回忆任务中提及的更多非共享信息被保留在集体认可的书面记录中,并且(b) 在讨论中提及的非共享信息在小组互动后更有可能被成员正确识别。

相似文献

1
Expert role assignment and information sampling during collective recall and decision making.集体回忆与决策过程中的专家角色分配和信息采样
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1995 Oct;69(4):619-28. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.69.4.619.
2
Assigned experts with competitive goals withhold information in group decision making.分配具有竞争目标的专家在群体决策中会隐瞒信息。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2013 Mar;52(1):161-72. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8309.2012.02105.x. Epub 2012 May 11.
3
Information sampling and group decision making: the effects of an advocacy decision procedure and task experience.信息抽样与群体决策:支持性决策程序和任务经验的影响
J Exp Psychol Appl. 2006 Mar;12(1):31-42. doi: 10.1037/1076-898X.12.1.31.
4
Children's collaborative recall of shared and unshared information.儿童对共享和非共享信息的协作回忆。
Br J Dev Psychol. 2013 Sep;31(Pt 3):302-17. doi: 10.1111/bjdp.12006. Epub 2012 Nov 30.
5
Diagnosing groups: charting the flow of information in medical decision-making teams.诊断小组:绘制医疗决策团队中的信息流图。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1996 Aug;71(2):315-30. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.71.2.315.
6
How do children share information in groups?孩子们如何在群体中分享信息?
Dev Psychol. 2014 Aug;50(8):2105-14. doi: 10.1037/a0037144. Epub 2014 Jun 9.
7
Diagnosing groups: the pooling, management, and impact of shared and unshared case information in team-based medical decision making.诊断分组:基于团队的医疗决策中共享和非共享病例信息的汇总、管理及影响
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1998 Jul;75(1):93-108. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.75.1.93.
8
Evidence of different underlying processes in pattern recall and decision-making.模式回忆和决策中不同潜在过程的证据。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2015;68(9):1813-31. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2014.992797. Epub 2015 Feb 9.
9
The effect of information distribution on collaborative inhibition.信息分布对协作抑制的影响。
Memory. 2011 Jul;19(5):417-28. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2011.583928. Epub 2011 Jun 30.
10
Accuracy and perceived expert status in group decisions: when minority members make majority members more accurate privately.群体决策中的准确性和感知专家地位:当少数派成员私下使多数派成员更加准确时。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2010 Mar;36(3):423-37. doi: 10.1177/0146167209353349.

引用本文的文献

1
Patient care in complex Sociotechnological ecosystems and learning health systems.复杂社会技术生态系统和学习型卫生系统中的患者护理。
Learn Health Syst. 2024 May 23;8(Suppl 1):e10427. doi: 10.1002/lrh2.10427. eCollection 2024 Jun.
2
"A debriefer must be neutral" and other debriefing myths: a systemic inquiry-based qualitative study of taken-for-granted beliefs about clinical post-event debriefing.“汇报者必须保持中立”及其他汇报误区:一项基于系统探究的关于临床事件后汇报中既定信念的定性研究
Adv Simul (Lond). 2021 Mar 4;6(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s41077-021-00161-5.
3
How Turbulence Brings Benefit: The Influence of Dynamic Team Environment on Entrepreneurial Team Innovation.
动荡如何带来益处:动态团队环境对创业团队创新的影响
Front Psychol. 2020 May 26;11:759. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00759. eCollection 2020.
4
If it doesn't help, it doesn't hurt? Information elaboration harms the performance of gender-diverse teams when attributions of competence are inaccurate.如果没有帮助,就不会造成伤害?当能力归因不准确时,信息阐述会损害性别多样化团队的表现。
PLoS One. 2018 Jul 19;13(7):e0201180. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0201180. eCollection 2018.
5
Expertise Redundancy, Transactive Memory, and Team Performance in Interdisciplinary Care Teams.跨学科护理团队中的专业知识冗余、交互记忆与团队绩效
Health Serv Res. 2018 Dec;53(6):4921-4942. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12996. Epub 2018 Jun 12.
6
Group discussion improves lie detection.小组讨论有助于提高测谎能力。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Jun 16;112(24):7460-5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1504048112. Epub 2015 May 26.
7
The name-letter-effect in groups: sharing initials with group members increases the quality of group work.群体中的名-字效应:与小组成员拥有相同首字母会提高小组工作的质量。
PLoS One. 2013 Nov 13;8(11):e79039. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0079039. eCollection 2013.
8
Results of community deliberation about social impacts of ecological restoration: comparing public input of self-selected versus actively engaged community members.社区对生态恢复社会影响的审议结果:比较自我选择和积极参与社区成员的公众意见。
Environ Manage. 2012 Aug;50(2):191-203. doi: 10.1007/s00267-012-9871-0. Epub 2012 May 22.
9
Adaptive group coordination and role differentiation.自适应群体协调与角色分化。
PLoS One. 2011;6(7):e22377. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0022377. Epub 2011 Jul 19.
10
On the formation of collective memories: the role of a dominant narrator.论集体记忆的形成:主导叙述者的作用
Mem Cognit. 2006 Jun;34(4):752-62. doi: 10.3758/bf03193423.