• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

诊断小组:绘制医疗决策团队中的信息流图。

Diagnosing groups: charting the flow of information in medical decision-making teams.

作者信息

Larson J R, Christensen C, Abbott A S, Franz T M

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Illinois at Chicago 60607-7137, USA.

出版信息

J Pers Soc Psychol. 1996 Aug;71(2):315-30. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.71.2.315.

DOI:10.1037//0022-3514.71.2.315
PMID:8765484
Abstract

Several hypotheses derived from an information sampling model of group discussion were tested with 3-person teams of physicians given 2 hypothetical medical cases to diagnose. Some of the information about each case was given to all 3 team members before discussion (shared information), whereas the rest was divided among them (unshared information). As predicted, shared information was, overall, more likely to be discussed than unshared information, and it was brought into discussion earlier. In addition, it was found that team leaders repeated substantially more case information than did other members and that, over time, they repeated unshared information at a steadily increasing rate. The latter findings are interpreted as evidence of leaders' information management role in problem-solving discussions.

摘要

从群体讨论的信息抽样模型中得出的几个假设,在由三名医生组成的团队中进行了测试,这些团队要诊断两个假设的医疗案例。每个案例的一些信息在讨论前提供给了所有三名团队成员(共享信息),而其余信息则在他们之间分配(非共享信息)。正如预测的那样,总体而言,共享信息比非共享信息更有可能被讨论,并且更早被引入讨论。此外,研究发现团队领导者重复的案例信息比其他成员多得多,而且随着时间的推移,他们重复非共享信息的速度稳步增加。后一项发现被解释为领导者在解决问题讨论中的信息管理作用的证据。

相似文献

1
Diagnosing groups: charting the flow of information in medical decision-making teams.诊断小组:绘制医疗决策团队中的信息流图。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1996 Aug;71(2):315-30. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.71.2.315.
2
Diagnosing groups: the pooling, management, and impact of shared and unshared case information in team-based medical decision making.诊断分组:基于团队的医疗决策中共享和非共享病例信息的汇总、管理及影响
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1998 Jul;75(1):93-108. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.75.1.93.
3
Decision making of clinical teams: communication patterns and diagnostic error.
Med Decis Making. 2000 Jan-Mar;20(1):45-50. doi: 10.1177/0272989X0002000106.
4
Information sampling and group decision making: the effects of an advocacy decision procedure and task experience.信息抽样与群体决策:支持性决策程序和任务经验的影响
J Exp Psychol Appl. 2006 Mar;12(1):31-42. doi: 10.1037/1076-898X.12.1.31.
5
Expert role assignment and information sampling during collective recall and decision making.集体回忆与决策过程中的专家角色分配和信息采样
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1995 Oct;69(4):619-28. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.69.4.619.
6
The shared leadership process in decision-making teams.决策团队中的共享领导力过程。
J Soc Psychol. 2012 Jan-Feb;152(1):17-42. doi: 10.1080/00224545.2010.538763.
7
Hidden profiles and concealed information: strategic information sharing and use in group decision making.隐藏的概况与隐蔽的信息:群体决策中的战略信息共享与运用
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2009 Jun;35(6):793-806. doi: 10.1177/0146167209333176. Epub 2009 Mar 30.
8
How do children share information in groups?孩子们如何在群体中分享信息?
Dev Psychol. 2014 Aug;50(8):2105-14. doi: 10.1037/a0037144. Epub 2014 Jun 9.
9
Playing favorites: the influence of leaders' inner circle on group processes and performance.厚此薄彼:领导者的核心圈子对团队流程及绩效的影响
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2009 Sep;35(9):1244-57. doi: 10.1177/0146167209338747. Epub 2009 Jul 6.
10
Shared or unshared consensus decision in macaques?猕猴中的共享或非共享共识决策?
Behav Processes. 2008 May;78(1):84-92. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2008.01.004. Epub 2008 Jan 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Patient care in complex Sociotechnological ecosystems and learning health systems.复杂社会技术生态系统和学习型卫生系统中的患者护理。
Learn Health Syst. 2024 May 23;8(Suppl 1):e10427. doi: 10.1002/lrh2.10427. eCollection 2024 Jun.
2
Association of Marginalized Identities With Alpha Omega Alpha Honor Society and Gold Humanism Honor Society Membership Among Medical Students.医学生边缘化身份与阿尔法欧米茄阿尔法荣誉学会和金人道主义荣誉学会会员资格的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Sep 1;5(9):e2229062. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.29062.
3
Optimizing Decision-Making Processes in Times of COVID-19: Using Reflexivity to Counteract Information-Processing Failures.
优化新冠疫情时期的决策过程:运用反思性来对抗信息处理失误。
Front Psychol. 2021 Jun 22;12:650525. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.650525. eCollection 2021.
4
Collective intelligence in medical decision-making: a systematic scoping review.医疗决策中的集体智慧:系统范围界定综述。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2019 Aug 9;19(1):158. doi: 10.1186/s12911-019-0882-0.
5
When those who know do share: Group goals facilitate information sharing, but social power does not undermine it.当知情者分享时:群体目标有助于信息共享,但社会权力不会破坏它。
PLoS One. 2019 Mar 11;14(3):e0213795. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0213795. eCollection 2019.
6
If it doesn't help, it doesn't hurt? Information elaboration harms the performance of gender-diverse teams when attributions of competence are inaccurate.如果没有帮助,就不会造成伤害?当能力归因不准确时,信息阐述会损害性别多样化团队的表现。
PLoS One. 2018 Jul 19;13(7):e0201180. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0201180. eCollection 2018.
7
The More, the Better?! Multiple vs. Single Jobholders' Job Satisfaction as a Matter of Lacked Information.越多越好?!兼职与全职工作者的工作满意度:信息不足的问题
Front Psychol. 2017 Jul 26;8:1274. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01274. eCollection 2017.
8
Investigating the Heart Pump Implant Decision Process: Opportunities for Decision Support Tools to Help.探究心脏泵植入决策过程:决策支持工具的助力机遇
ACM Trans Comput Hum Interact. 2016 May;2016:4477-4488. doi: 10.1145/2858036.2858373.
9
An interactive handoff workshop to improve intern readiness in patient care transitions.一个旨在提高实习生在患者护理转接过程中准备程度的互动式交接研讨会。
J Grad Med Educ. 2012 Mar;4(1):68-71. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-11-00067.1.
10
Cells, circuits, and choices: social influences on perceptual decision making.细胞、神经回路与选择:社会因素对感知决策的影响
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2008 Dec;8(4):498-508. doi: 10.3758/CABN.8.4.498.