Grunstein R R
Sleep Disorders Centre, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, Sydney, Australia.
Thorax. 1995 Oct;50(10):1106-13. doi: 10.1136/thx.50.10.1106.
CPAP should be considered the first line of treatment in patients with moderate to severe obstructive sleep apnoea. In our centre in Sydney this generally means patients with more than 20 apnoea/hypopnoeas per hour with repeated dips in oxyhaemoglobin saturation and usually some symptomatology. Despite this first line role of nasal CPAP, recent objective studies question whether earlier enthusiastic reports on adherence to CPAP are correct. The role of technical innovations in new CPAP machines in improving usage remains to be tested. The "drop out" rate from physician selection for a CPAP trial to highly compliant user is certainly more than 50% of patients. What happens to these patients? Data from some studies suggest that surgical treatments are used, at least in the USA, but in all probability many of these patients remain untreated. The challenge in the next decade is either to improve CPAP devices to increase usage in this group or to develop other treatment options. The role of intensive inhospital "acclimatisation" to CPAP also has yet to be objectively tested. It is unclear whether "intelligent" CPAP will make huge inroads in increasing the number of patients who accept CPAP trials, prescriptions, or compliance. It will have minimal impact on patients with mask problems or claustrophobia or those who feel that CPAP is inconvenient. There is a high likelihood that it will reduce technologist workload during CPAP titration studies. "Intelligent" CPAP may help to reduce total overnight mouth leakage and therefore reduce nasal side effects. The current expense of developing such devices will mean that they are unlikely to supersede much cheaper standard "one pressure" CPAP machines in the next few years.
对于中重度阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停患者,持续气道正压通气(CPAP)应被视为一线治疗方法。在我们悉尼的中心,这通常意味着每小时呼吸暂停/低通气超过20次、血氧饱和度反复下降且通常伴有一些症状的患者。尽管鼻CPAP有这种一线治疗的作用,但近期的客观研究对早期关于CPAP依从性的热情报道是否正确提出了质疑。新型CPAP机器中的技术创新在提高其使用率方面的作用仍有待检验。从被医生选入CPAP试验到成为高度依从使用者的“退出”率肯定超过患者总数的50%。这些患者后来怎样了呢?一些研究的数据表明,至少在美国,会采用手术治疗,但很可能许多这类患者仍未得到治疗。未来十年面临的挑战要么是改进CPAP设备以提高该群体的使用率,要么是开发其他治疗选择。在医院进行强化CPAP“适应”的作用也尚未得到客观检验。尚不清楚“智能”CPAP是否会在增加接受CPAP试验、处方或依从性的患者数量方面取得巨大进展。它对有面罩问题、幽闭恐惧症或觉得CPAP不方便的患者影响极小。它很可能会减少CPAP滴定研究期间技术人员的工作量。“智能”CPAP可能有助于减少夜间总的口腔漏气量,从而减轻鼻部副作用。开发此类设备目前的成本意味着在未来几年它们不太可能取代便宜得多的标准“单压力”CPAP机器。