Suppr超能文献

用于鉴定草绿色链球菌的表型特征、DNA-DNA杂交结果以及商用快速生化和酶促反应系统结果的比较。

Comparison of phenotypic characteristics, DNA-DNA hybridization results, and results with a commercial rapid biochemical and enzymatic reaction system for identification of viridans group streptococci.

作者信息

Kikuchi K, Enari T, Totsuka K, Shimizu K

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Tokyo Women's Medical College Hospital, Japan.

出版信息

J Clin Microbiol. 1995 May;33(5):1215-22. doi: 10.1128/jcm.33.5.1215-1222.1995.

Abstract

The rapid ID 32 Strep system (bioMérieux, Marcy l'Etoile, France) was evaluated for its ability to identify 21 species of viridans group streptococci; results were compared with DNA-DNA hybridization results and results of conventional physiological tests. A total of 171 strains of the 21 species including 147 clinical strains was analyzed. Of the 156 strains of species included in the database of this system, 136 strains (87%) were correctly identified. Incorrect identification occurred for 13 strains (8%), and no identification was given for 7 strains (5%). It was difficult to differentiate S. mitis and S. oralis accurately with this system. Of the 17 strains identified as S. mitis by the rapid ID 32 Strep system, the results of DNA-DNA hybridization were in agreement for only 3 strains. S. crista and S. parasanguis, which are not included in the database, were identified as S. mitis or S. sanguis or were not identified, but S. parasanguis could probably be identified by using the rapid ID 32 Strep system because the biochemical profile is well characterized for this species. The rapid ID 32 Strep system can be used to differentiate most species for which phenotypic characteristics have been described if the database is revised according to recently reported amended criteria for the identification of viridans group streptococci. However, identification of a few species such as S. mitis and S. oralis is problematic with this system.

摘要

对快速ID 32链球菌系统(法国马赛-埃托瓦勒生物梅里埃公司)鉴定21种草绿色链球菌的能力进行了评估;将结果与DNA-DNA杂交结果以及传统生理试验结果进行了比较。共分析了包括147株临床菌株在内的21个菌种的171株菌株。在该系统数据库中包含的156株菌种中,136株(87%)被正确鉴定。13株(8%)鉴定错误,7株(5%)未给出鉴定结果。使用该系统很难准确区分缓症链球菌和口腔链球菌。在快速ID 32链球菌系统鉴定为缓症链球菌的17株菌株中,DNA-DNA杂交结果仅3株一致。数据库中未包含的隐匿链球菌和副血链球菌被鉴定为缓症链球菌或血链球菌,或者未被鉴定,但副血链球菌可能可以通过快速ID 32链球菌系统鉴定,因为该菌种的生化特征已得到充分描述。如果根据最近报道的草绿色链球菌鉴定修订标准对数据库进行修订,快速ID 32链球菌系统可用于区分大多数已描述表型特征的菌种。然而,该系统对缓症链球菌和口腔链球菌等少数菌种的鉴定存在问题。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验