Pérez J L, De Oña M, Niubò J, Villar H, Melón S, García A, Martín R
Service of Microbiology, Hospital Prínceps d'Espanya, Ciutat Sanitària i Universitària de Bellvitge, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain.
J Clin Microbiol. 1995 Jun;33(6):1646-9. doi: 10.1128/jcm.33.6.1646-1649.1995.
Two fixation methods based on formaldehyde or acetone for qualitative cytomegalovirus antigenemia assay were evaluated on 405 consecutive blood samples. Cytomegalovirus was detected in 40 samples by the antigenemia assay: 36 were detected by formaldehyde fixation; 22, by acetone; and 18, by both methods. Differences were statistically significant (P = 0.0043). In addition, four fixation methods (two based on formalin [with and without permeabilization] and two using acetone at different fixation times) for quantitative antigenemia assay in a different set of 32 samples from known viremic patients were evaluated. Formalin-based methods were superior to acetone-based methods, showing statistically significant differences in either the number of positive samples detected (P < 0.02; McNemar test) or the mean positive cell counts (P < 0.003; two-tailed Student's t test for paired samples). No differences between the two formalin-based methods were found. We recommend the formaldehyde fixation procedure without subsequent permeabilization because of its simplicity and sensitivity.
对405份连续血样评估了基于甲醛或丙酮的两种固定方法用于定性巨细胞病毒抗原血症检测。通过抗原血症检测在40份样本中检测到巨细胞病毒:甲醛固定法检测到36份;丙酮法检测到22份;两种方法均检测到18份。差异具有统计学意义(P = 0.0043)。此外,对来自已知病毒血症患者的另一组32份样本评估了四种用于定量抗原血症检测的固定方法(两种基于福尔马林[有和无通透处理]以及两种在不同固定时间使用丙酮)。基于福尔马林的方法优于基于丙酮的方法,在检测到的阳性样本数量(P < 0.02;McNemar检验)或平均阳性细胞计数(P < 0.003;配对样本双尾Student t检验)方面显示出统计学显著差异。未发现两种基于福尔马林的方法之间存在差异。由于其简单性和敏感性,我们推荐不进行后续通透处理的甲醛固定程序。