Daltroy L H, Phillips C B, Eaton H M, Larson M G, Partridge A J, Logigian M, Liang M H
Robert B. Brigham Multipurpose Arthritis Center, Boston, MA, USA.
Am J Public Health. 1995 Apr;85(4):558-60. doi: 10.2105/ajph.85.4.558.
The Physical Capacity Evaluation, a performance measure of functional capabilities comprised of 13 tasks simulating those used in activities of daily living, was tested on 289 community-dwelling elderly people and compared against a widely used self-report measure of function, the Health Assessment Questionnaire. Factor analysis identified one dominant component in each instrument. Internal consistency reliability (Cronbach's alpha) was .90 for both instruments. Global disability (Health Assessment Questionnaire) and function (Physical Capacity Evaluation) scores were correlated -.74. One-week retest reliabilities on 58 subjects were .94 for the Physical Capacity Evaluation and .95 for the Health Assessment Questionnaire. The Physical Capacity Evaluation is a valid and reliable measure of physical performance for use with elderly people.
对289名社区居住的老年人进行了体能评估,这是一种由13项模拟日常生活活动的任务组成的功能能力表现测量方法,并与一种广泛使用的功能自评方法——健康评估问卷进行了比较。因子分析在每种工具中都确定了一个主要成分。两种工具的内部一致性信度(克朗巴哈系数)均为0.90。整体残疾(健康评估问卷)和功能(体能评估)得分的相关性为-0.74。对58名受试者进行的一周重测信度,体能评估为0.94,健康评估问卷为0.95。体能评估是一种用于老年人的有效且可靠的身体表现测量方法。