Scano G, Spinelli A, Duranti R, Gorini M, Gigliotti F, Goti P, Milic-Emili J
Dept of Internal Medicine, Università degli Studi di Firenze, Italy.
Eur Respir J. 1995 Jan;8(1):78-85. doi: 10.1183/09031936.95.08010078.
To ascertain whether and to what extent the reduced ventilatory response to a hypercapnic stimulus in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients depends on a blunted chemoresponsiveness of central origin or to mechanical impairment, we studied two groups of COPD patients without (group A) and with (group B) chronic hypercapnia, but with similar degrees of airway obstruction and hyperinflation. The study was performed on 17 patients (9 normocapnic and 8 hypercapnic). Six age-matched normal subjects (group C) were also studied as a control. During a CO2 rebreathing test, ventilation (VE), mouth occlusion pressure (P0.1), and the electromyographic activity of diaphragm (Edi) were recorded and then plotted against end-tidal carbon dioxide tension (PCO2). Inspiratory muscle strength was significantly lower in the hypercapnic group (group B) compared to normocapnic group (A), and in these groups compared to the control group (C). Both patient groups exhibited significantly lower delta VE/delta PCO2 than the control group. In hypercapnics, delta P0.1/delta PCO2 was significantly lower than in normocapnics and control group, whilst mouth occlusion pressure as % of maximal inspiratory pressure delta P0.1 (% MIP)/delta PCO2 did not differ significantly among the three groups. delta Edi/delta PCO2 increased from C to A. At a PCO2 of 8.65 kPa, VE was similar in the normocapnic and control group, but lower in hypercapnics; Edi was similar in hypercapnic and control group; but greater in normocapnics. P0.1(% MIP) did not differ significantly among groups.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
为了确定慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者对高碳酸血症刺激的通气反应降低是否以及在何种程度上取决于中枢性化学感受反应迟钝或机械性损伤,我们研究了两组COPD患者,一组(A组)无慢性高碳酸血症,另一组(B组)有慢性高碳酸血症,但两组气道阻塞和肺过度充气程度相似。该研究纳入了17例患者(9例正常碳酸血症患者和8例高碳酸血症患者)。还研究了6名年龄匹配的正常受试者作为对照组(C组)。在二氧化碳重复呼吸试验期间,记录通气量(VE)、口腔阻断压(P0.1)和膈肌肌电图活动(Edi),然后将其与呼气末二氧化碳分压(PCO2)作图。与正常碳酸血症组(A组)相比,高碳酸血症组(B组)的吸气肌力量显著降低,且这两组与对照组(C组)相比也是如此。两组患者的ΔVE/ΔPCO2均显著低于对照组。在高碳酸血症患者中,ΔP0.1/ΔPCO2显著低于正常碳酸血症患者和对照组,而口腔阻断压占最大吸气压力的百分比ΔP0.1(%MIP)/ΔPCO2在三组之间无显著差异。ΔEdi/ΔPCO2从C组到A组增加。在PCO2为8.65 kPa时,正常碳酸血症组和对照组的VE相似,但高碳酸血症患者的VE较低;高碳酸血症组和对照组的Edi相似,但正常碳酸血症患者的Edi更大。各组之间P0.1(%MIP)无显著差异。(摘要截断于250字)