Lichstein K L, Schreibman L
J Autism Child Schizophr. 1976 Jun;6(2):163-73. doi: 10.1007/BF01538060.
The use of electric shock in a punishment paradigm has continued to be a highly controversial issue in the treatment of autistic children. While the experimental literature argues for the effectiveness of the procedure for reducing maladaptive behaviors, some clinicians and researchers have expressed fear of possible negative side effects. The reported side effects of contingent electric shock were reviewed in an attempt to evaluate the validity of these fears. The review indicated that the majority of reported side effects of shock were of a positive nature. These positive effects included response generalization, increases in social behavior, and positive emotional behavior. The few negative side effects reported included fear of the shock apparatus, negative emotional behavior, and increases in other maladaptive behavior. The implication of these findings for the use of the shock procedure are discussed in terms of correct usage of the shock, therapist reservations, and alternative procedures.
在对自闭症儿童的治疗中,在惩罚范式下使用电击一直是一个极具争议的问题。虽然实验文献认为该程序在减少适应不良行为方面是有效的,但一些临床医生和研究人员表达了对可能的负面副作用的担忧。为了评估这些担忧的合理性,对有条件电击的报告副作用进行了审查。审查表明,报告的电击副作用大多具有积极性质。这些积极影响包括反应泛化、社交行为增加和积极情绪行为。报告的少数负面副作用包括对电击设备的恐惧、负面情绪行为和其他适应不良行为的增加。从电击的正确使用、治疗师的保留意见和替代程序等方面讨论了这些发现对电击程序使用的意义。