The relaxant responses of S-nitroso-L-cysteine (CysNO), S-nitroso-N-acetyl-D,L-penicillamine (SNAP), S-nitroso-N-acetyl-L-cysteine (SNAC) and S-nitrosoglutathione (GSNO) in the rat gastric fundus (forestomach) were studied and compared to the relaxant responses obtained in response to nitric oxide (NO) and electrical field stimulation (EFS, 10 s strains) of non-adrenergic non-cholinergic (NANC) nerves. 2. CysNO (10(-7)-3 x 10(-4) M) caused transient relaxation of the precontracted rat gastric fundus, comparable to the response to NO (10(-6)-10(-4) M) and EFS. SNAP, SNAC and GSNO elicited more sustained relaxations. 3. The cyclic GMP-specific phosphodiesterase inhibitor, zaprinast (3 x 10(-5) M) increased the relaxant effect of CysNO, SNAP and GSNO while the NO-synthase inhibitor, NG-nitro-L-arginine (L-NOARG, 3 x 10(-4) M) had no influence. 4. In the presence of LY 83583 (10(-5) M), which releases superoxide anions, the relaxant response to NO and CysNO was decreased, whereas that to all other stimuli was unaltered. The inhibitory effect of LY 83583 on CsNO-induced relaxations was prevented by superoxide dismutase (SOD, 1000 u ml-1). 5. Tissues incubated for 1 h with 5.5 x 10(-4) M nitroglycerin (GTN) became tolerant to GTN. In this condition, the relaxant response to 10(-5) M NO was maintained, while the relaxations by EFS (8 Hz) and 3 x 10(-5) M SNAP were significantly decreased. The reduction of the response to the other S-nitrosothiols was not significant. 6. The combination of nitrate tolerance and 10-5 M LY 83583 caused a significantly larger inhibition of the relaxant response to EFS (8 Hz) than nitrate tolerance alone. The combination of LY 83583 and GTN tolerance reduced the relaxant effect of 10-5 M NO to a similar extent to LY 83583 alone, while the relaxant response to 10-4 M GTN was reduced to the same extent as after 1 h exposure to 5.5 x 10-4 M GTN alone.7. It is concluded that S-nitrosothiols potently relax the rat gastric fundus, possibly by a cyclic GMP-dependent mechanism and S-nitrosothiols such as SNAC and GSNO may be involved in NANC neurotransmission.
摘要
研究了S-亚硝基-L-半胱氨酸(CysNO)、S-亚硝基-N-乙酰-D,L-青霉胺(SNAP)、S-亚硝基-N-乙酰-L-半胱氨酸(SNAC)和S-亚硝基谷胱甘肽(GSNO)对大鼠胃底(前胃)的舒张反应,并将其与一氧化氮(NO)和非肾上腺素能非胆碱能(NANC)神经的电场刺激(EFS,10秒刺激)所产生的舒张反应进行比较。2. CysNO(10⁻⁷ - 3×10⁻⁴ M)可引起预先收缩的大鼠胃底短暂舒张,与对NO(10⁻⁶ - 10⁻⁴ M)和EFS的反应相当。SNAP、SNAC和GSNO引起的舒张更持久。3. 环鸟苷酸特异性磷酸二酯酶抑制剂扎普司特(3×10⁻⁵ M)增强了CysNO、SNAP和GSNO的舒张作用,而一氧化氮合酶抑制剂NG-硝基-L-精氨酸(L-NOARG,3×10⁻⁴ M)则无影响。4. 在能释放超氧阴离子的LY 83583(10⁻⁵ M)存在下,对NO和CysNO的舒张反应降低,而对所有其他刺激的反应未改变。超氧化物歧化酶(SOD,1000 u/ml⁻¹)可阻止LY 83583对CsNO诱导舒张的抑制作用。5. 用5.5×10⁻⁴ M硝酸甘油(GTN)孵育1小时的组织对GTN产生耐受。在此条件下,对10⁻⁵ M NO的舒张反应得以维持,而EFS(8 Hz)和3×10⁻⁵ M SNAP引起的舒张则显著降低。对其他S-亚硝基硫醇反应的降低不显著。6. 硝酸甘油耐受与10⁻⁵ M LY 83583联合使用对EFS(8 Hz)舒张反应的抑制作用明显大于单独的硝酸甘油耐受。LY 83583与GTN耐受联合使用使10⁻⁵ M NO的舒张作用降低程度与单独使用LY 83583相似,而对10⁻⁴ M GTN的舒张反应降低程度与单独暴露于5.5×10⁻⁴ M GTN 1小时后相同。7. 得出结论:S-亚硝基硫醇可有效舒张大鼠胃底,可能通过环鸟苷酸依赖性机制,且SNAC和GSNO等S-亚硝基硫醇可能参与NANC神经传递。