Chapman L J, Chapman J P, Kwapil T R, Eckblad M, Zinser M C
Department of Psychology, University of Wisconsin, Madison 53706.
J Abnorm Psychol. 1994 May;103(2):171-83. doi: 10.1037//0021-843x.103.2.171.
The predictive validities of several indicators of psychosis proneness were evaluated in a 10-year longitudinal study (N = 508). As hypothesized, high scorers on the Perceptual Aberration Scale, Magical Ideation Scale, or both (n = 182), especially those who initially reported psychoticlike experiences of at least moderate deviance, exceeded control subjects (n = 153) on psychoses (revised 3rd edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders), psychotic relatives, schizotypal symptoms, and psychoticlike experiences at follow up. Ss who initially scored high on the Magical Ideation Scale and above the mean on the Social Anhedonia Scale were especially deviant. The Physical Anhedonia Scale and the Impulsive Nonconformity Scale were not effective predictors of psychosis proneness.
在一项为期10年的纵向研究（N = 508）中，评估了几种精神病易感性指标的预测效度。正如所假设的那样，在感知异常量表、奇幻思维量表或两者上得分高的人（n = 182），特别是那些最初报告至少有中度偏差的类精神病体验的人，在随访时，在精神病（《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第3版修订版）、有精神病亲属、分裂型症状和类精神病体验方面超过了对照组（n = 153）。最初在奇幻思维量表上得分高且在社交快感缺乏量表上高于平均水平的受试者尤其异常。躯体快感缺乏量表和冲动性非从众量表不是精神病易感性的有效预测指标。
