Zwadyk P, Pierson C L, Young C
Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27705.
J Clin Microbiol. 1994 May;32(5):1273-9. doi: 10.1128/jcm.32.5.1273-1279.1994.
The Difco ESP and Organon Teknika BacT/Alert (BTA) systems were evaluated in a clinical study of 5,421 aerobic and 5,035 anaerobic blood cultures. Of 405 clinically significant positive cultures evaluated, 272 grew in both systems, 86 grew in ESP only, and 47 grew in BTA only (P < 0.005). Of 320 organisms detected in aerobic bottles, 208 grew in both systems, 68 grew in ESP only and 45 grew in BTA only (P < 0.05), with Staphylococcus aureus the only organism showing a statistically significant difference. The ESP anaerobic bottle also detected more anaerobes (16 of 17 versus 4 of 17, P < 0.005) and more organisms overall (57 versus 34, P < 0.05). However, with the exception of patients with anaerobic bacteremia (12 of 13 for ESP and 4 of 13 for BTA, P < 0.05), there was no statistical difference in the detection of patient episodes. Average detection time of matched aerobic bottles was 18.3 h for ESP and 22.0 h for BTA (P < 0.001). For matched pairs of anaerobic bottles, the average detection time was faster in the BTA bottles (P < 0.001), because of the growth of facultative organisms. To explore the differences in anaerobic detection more fully, 20 sets of anaerobic bottles were seeded with 12 anaerobic species mixed with human blood. ESP grew more organisms (17 of 20 versus 10 of 20, P < 0.025), and the average time to detection for the 10 paired positive cultures was 21.6 h for ESP and 50.8 h for BTA (P < 0.05). Times for loading and unloading bottles were similar for both systems.
在一项对5421份需氧血培养和5035份厌氧血培养的临床研究中,对迪夫科ESP系统和奥加农泰尼克BacT/Alert(BTA)系统进行了评估。在评估的405份具有临床意义的阳性培养物中,272份在两个系统中均生长,86份仅在ESP中生长,47份仅在BTA中生长(P<0.005)。在需氧瓶中检测到的320种微生物中,208种在两个系统中均生长,68种仅在ESP中生长,45种仅在BTA中生长(P<0.05),金黄色葡萄球菌是唯一显示出统计学显著差异的微生物。ESP厌氧瓶还检测到更多的厌氧菌(17种中的16种对17种中的4种,P<0.005)和总体上更多的微生物(57种对34种,P<0.05)。然而,除了厌氧菌血症患者外(ESP为13例中的12例,BTA为13例中的4例,P<0.05),在患者发作的检测方面没有统计学差异。匹配的需氧瓶的平均检测时间,ESP为18.3小时,BTA为22.0小时(P<0.001)。对于匹配的厌氧瓶对,由于兼性微生物的生长,BTA瓶中的平均检测时间更快(P<0.001)。为了更全面地探索厌氧检测的差异,用12种厌氧菌种与人血混合接种了20组厌氧瓶。ESP生长的微生物更多(20组中的17组对20组中的10组,P<0.025),10对阳性培养物的平均检测时间,ESP为21.6小时,BTA为50.8小时(P<0.05)。两个系统装瓶和卸瓶的时间相似。