Suppr超能文献

迪夫科ESP和奥加农·泰尼克BacT/Alert连续监测血培养系统的比较。

Comparison of Difco ESP and Organon Teknika BacT/Alert continuous-monitoring blood culture systems.

作者信息

Zwadyk P, Pierson C L, Young C

机构信息

Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27705.

出版信息

J Clin Microbiol. 1994 May;32(5):1273-9. doi: 10.1128/jcm.32.5.1273-1279.1994.

Abstract

The Difco ESP and Organon Teknika BacT/Alert (BTA) systems were evaluated in a clinical study of 5,421 aerobic and 5,035 anaerobic blood cultures. Of 405 clinically significant positive cultures evaluated, 272 grew in both systems, 86 grew in ESP only, and 47 grew in BTA only (P < 0.005). Of 320 organisms detected in aerobic bottles, 208 grew in both systems, 68 grew in ESP only and 45 grew in BTA only (P < 0.05), with Staphylococcus aureus the only organism showing a statistically significant difference. The ESP anaerobic bottle also detected more anaerobes (16 of 17 versus 4 of 17, P < 0.005) and more organisms overall (57 versus 34, P < 0.05). However, with the exception of patients with anaerobic bacteremia (12 of 13 for ESP and 4 of 13 for BTA, P < 0.05), there was no statistical difference in the detection of patient episodes. Average detection time of matched aerobic bottles was 18.3 h for ESP and 22.0 h for BTA (P < 0.001). For matched pairs of anaerobic bottles, the average detection time was faster in the BTA bottles (P < 0.001), because of the growth of facultative organisms. To explore the differences in anaerobic detection more fully, 20 sets of anaerobic bottles were seeded with 12 anaerobic species mixed with human blood. ESP grew more organisms (17 of 20 versus 10 of 20, P < 0.025), and the average time to detection for the 10 paired positive cultures was 21.6 h for ESP and 50.8 h for BTA (P < 0.05). Times for loading and unloading bottles were similar for both systems.

摘要

在一项对5421份需氧血培养和5035份厌氧血培养的临床研究中,对迪夫科ESP系统和奥加农泰尼克BacT/Alert(BTA)系统进行了评估。在评估的405份具有临床意义的阳性培养物中,272份在两个系统中均生长,86份仅在ESP中生长,47份仅在BTA中生长(P<0.005)。在需氧瓶中检测到的320种微生物中,208种在两个系统中均生长,68种仅在ESP中生长,45种仅在BTA中生长(P<0.05),金黄色葡萄球菌是唯一显示出统计学显著差异的微生物。ESP厌氧瓶还检测到更多的厌氧菌(17种中的16种对17种中的4种,P<0.005)和总体上更多的微生物(57种对34种,P<0.05)。然而,除了厌氧菌血症患者外(ESP为13例中的12例,BTA为13例中的4例,P<0.05),在患者发作的检测方面没有统计学差异。匹配的需氧瓶的平均检测时间,ESP为18.3小时,BTA为22.0小时(P<0.001)。对于匹配的厌氧瓶对,由于兼性微生物的生长,BTA瓶中的平均检测时间更快(P<0.001)。为了更全面地探索厌氧检测的差异,用12种厌氧菌种与人血混合接种了20组厌氧瓶。ESP生长的微生物更多(20组中的17组对20组中的10组,P<0.025),10对阳性培养物的平均检测时间,ESP为21.6小时,BTA为50.8小时(P<0.05)。两个系统装瓶和卸瓶的时间相似。

相似文献

2
Comparison of BacT/Alert with Signal blood culture system.BacT/Alert与信号血培养系统的比较。
J Clin Microbiol. 1995 Feb;33(2):313-7. doi: 10.1128/jcm.33.2.313-317.1995.
3
Detection of bacteremia by Difco ESP blood culture system.使用Difco ESP血培养系统检测菌血症
J Clin Microbiol. 1994 Mar;32(3):811-8. doi: 10.1128/jcm.32.3.811-818.1994.

引用本文的文献

5
Update on detection of bacteremia and fungemia.菌血症和真菌血症检测的最新进展。
Clin Microbiol Rev. 1997 Jul;10(3):444-65. doi: 10.1128/CMR.10.3.444.

本文引用的文献

3
Detection of bacteremia by Difco ESP blood culture system.使用Difco ESP血培养系统检测菌血症
J Clin Microbiol. 1994 Mar;32(3):811-8. doi: 10.1128/jcm.32.3.811-818.1994.
5

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验